Max Occupation of Spacetime: Lorentz-Fitzgerald Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hebob80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Spacetime
Hebob80
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Given the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction equation:

t = \sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}

'c' can be understood as the maximum allowable occupation of spacetime.

I've seen it written on these boards that black holes are calculated by Einstein's equations as infinitely dense points, which is to say, there is no maximum occupation of spacetime for them. Shouldn't there be?

In the Lorentz-Fitzgerald equation, an object moving the speed of light is calculated as contracting to a single point in the direction of motion, but we can hardly say that this object is infinitely dense, in fact someone on the ship would measure the ship as if it were at rest. So wouldn't the same be true for a black hole? If this is true for black holes, as well as an object moving the speed of light, then wouldn't there be some calculatable maximum density?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hebob80 said:
Given the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction equation:

t = \sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}

'c' can be understood as the maximum allowable occupation of spacetime.
Huh? I don't understand where you get this interpretation.

Hebob80 said:
In the Lorentz-Fitzgerald equation, an object moving the speed of light is calculated as contracting to a single point in the direction of motion, but we can hardly say that this object is infinitely dense, in fact someone on the ship would measure the ship as if it were at rest.

Material objects can't move at c.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top