MHB Max Volume of Cylinder Inscribed in a Cone: Dimensions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dimensions of a cylinder inscribed in a right circular cone with a height of 6 and a base radius of 4.5 that maximizes the cylinder's volume. The volume function of the cylinder is derived as V(h, r) = πhr², with constraints based on the cone's dimensions. By applying calculus, critical values are found, leading to the conclusion that the maximum volume occurs at a cylinder radius of 3 units and a height of 2 units. This solution is consistent across different mathematical approaches, including single-variable optimization and Lagrange multipliers. Ultimately, the maximum volume of the cylinder is calculated to be 4/9 of the cone's volume.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

A cylinder is inscribed in a right circular cone of height 6 and base radius equal to 4.5. What are the dimens?


A cylinder is inscribed in a right circular cone of height 6 and base radius equal to 4.5. What are the dimensions of such a cylinder which has maximum volume?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello halle,

Let's work this problem in general terms so that we then derive a formula into which we can plug the given data.

First, let's draw a diagram of a cross-section through the axes of symmetry for the cone and cylinder. We will orient our coordinate axes such that the origin as at the center of the circular base of the cone. The radius and height of the cone are $R$ and $H$ respectively, while the radius and height of the cylinder are $r$ and $h$ respectively. Since these parameters and variables represent linear measures, we assume they are non-negative. Both measures of the cone must be positive.

View attachment 1629

Now, our objective function, that function that we wish to optimize, is the volume $V$ of the cylinder:

$$V(h,r)=\pi hr^2$$

As we can see, the point $(h,r)$ is constrained to lie along the line:

$$y=-\frac{H}{R}x+H$$

and thus, our constraint may be given as:

$$g(h,r)=\frac{H}{R}r-H+h=0$$

Let's first use a single variable approach. We may solve the constraint for $h$:

$$h=H-\frac{H}{R}r=\frac{H(R-r)}{R}$$

Substituting for $h$ into the objective function, we obtain the volume of the cylinder in terms of its radius only (recall the radius and height of the cone are parameters, not variables, and so we treat them as constants):

$$V(r)=\pi\left(\frac{H(R-r)}{R} \right)r^2=\frac{\pi H}{R}\left(Rr^2-r^3 \right)$$

Next, we want to differentiate this with respect to $r$ and equate the result to zero to find the critical value(s).

$$V'(r)=\frac{\pi H}{R}\left(2Rr-3r^2 \right)=\frac{\pi H}{R}r(2R-3r)=0$$

Hence, we find two critical values:

$$r=0,\,\frac{2}{3}R$$

To determine the nature of the extrema associated with these critical values, we may use the second derivative test. Computing the second derivative of the volume function with respect to $r$, we find:

$$V''(r)=\frac{\pi H}{R}\left(2R-6r \right)=\frac{2\pi H}{R}\left(R-3r \right)$$

Thus, we find:

$$V''(0)=2\pi H>0$$

Thus the critical value $r=0$ is at a minimum.

$$V''\left(\frac{2}{3}R \right)=\frac{2\pi H}{R}\left(R-3\left(\frac{2}{3}R \right) \right)=-2\pi H<0$$

Thus the critical value $r=\frac{2}{3}R$ is at a maximum. This is the critical value in which we are interested. Thus the dimensions of the cone which maximize its volume are:

$$r=\frac{2}{3}R$$

$$h=\frac{H\left(R-\frac{2}{3}R \right))}{R}=\frac{1}{3}H$$

We may also use a multi-variable technique: Lagrange multipliers. Using this method, we obtain the system:

[math]2\pi rh=\frac{H}{R}\lambda[/math]

[math]\pi r^2=\lambda[/math]

This implies:

[math]2\pi rh\frac{R}{H}=\pi r^2[/math]

Observing that $r=0$ is the critical point associated with the minimal volume, we may divide through by $\pi r$ to obtain:

[math]2h\frac{R}{H}=r[/math]

Now, substituting for $r$ into the constraint, we find:

[math]h+\frac{H}{R}\cdot2h\frac{R}{H}-H=0[/math]

[math]h=\frac{H}{3}\implies r=\frac{2}{3}R[/math]

Hence, from both methods, we find the maximum volume of the cylinder is:

[math]V_{\max}=V\left(\frac{2}{3}R,\frac{H}{3} \right)=\pi\left(\frac{2}{3}R \right)^2\left(\frac{H}{3} \right)=\frac{4}{27}\pi R^2H[/math]

This is $\dfrac{4}{9}$ the volume of the cone.

Now we may plug in our given data:

$$H=6,\,R=\frac{9}{2}$$

to obtain for this problem:

$$r=\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{9}{2}=3$$

$$h=\frac{1}{3}\cdot6=2$$

Thus, we have found that the dimensions of the cylinder inscribed within the given cone having maximum volume are a radius of 3 units and a height of 2 units.
 

Attachments

  • halle.jpg
    halle.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 121
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top