MHB Maximize Σ(x^2+y)(y^2+x))/((x+y-1)^2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the maximum value of T in the inequality involving a cyclically symmetric function of three variables, x, y, and z. The function is expressed as a sum of terms that depend on the variables and is analyzed for its minimum value. It is determined that the lower bound of the function is -3/4, achieved when all variables are equal to specific roots of a quadratic equation. The analysis employs techniques such as minimizing a derived function and polarizing expressions to confirm the bounds. The conclusion emphasizes the significance of the derived minimum value in relation to the original inequality.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Find the greatest real number, $T$, that satisfies the inequality:

\[\frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2}+\frac{(y^2+z)(z^2+y)}{(y+z-1)^2}+\frac{(z^2+x)(x^2+z)}{(x+z-1)^2}-2(x+y+z)\geq T\]

for all real numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$, such that $x+y \ne 1$, $y+z \ne 1$ and $x+z \ne 1$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Find the greatest real number, $T$, that satisfies the inequality:

\[\frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2}+\frac{(y^2+z)(z^2+y)}{(y+z-1)^2}+\frac{(z^2+x)(x^2+z)}{(x+z-1)^2}-2(x+y+z)\geq T\]

for all real numbers $x$, $y$ and $z$, such that $x+y \ne 1$, $y+z \ne 1$ and $x+z \ne 1$.
[sp]
Let $f(x,y,z) = \frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2}+\frac{(y^2+z)(z^2+y)}{(y+z-1)^2}+\frac{(z^2+x)(x^2+z)}{(x+z-1)^2}-2(x+y+z)$. Then $f(x,y,z)$ is the cyclically symmetric sum of three functions of two variables, one of which is $g(x,y) = \dfrac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2} - (x+y)$.

It seems like a good guess that $g(x,y)$ will be minimised when $y=x$ (and no doubt MarkFL would produce a "cyclic symmetry" argument to justify that). But $$g(x,x) = \frac{(x^2+x)^2 - 2x(2x-1)^2}{(2x-1)^2} = \frac{x^4 - 6x^3 + 9x^2 -2x}{(2x-1)^2} = \frac{\bigl(x^2 - 3x + \frac12\bigr)^2 - \frac14(2x-1)^2}{(2x-1)^2} = \biggl(\frac{x^2 - 3x + \frac12}{2x-1}\biggr)^2 - \frac14.$$ That has a lower bound of $-\frac14$, attained when $x$ is a root of $x^2 - 3x + \frac12$, namely $x = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

So the next step is to see whether $-\frac14$ is a lower bound for $g(x,y)$. In fact, $$g(x,y) + \frac14 = \frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x) - \bigl(x+y-\frac14 \bigr)(x+y-1)^2}{(x+y-1)^2} = \frac{x^2y^2 - 3xy(x+y) + \frac94(x^2+y^2) + \frac{11}2xy - \frac32(x+y) + \frac14}{(x+y-1)^2}.$$ But polarising the expression in the above calculation for $g(x,x)$ gives exactly the numerator of that fraction, namely $$\bigl(xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac12\bigr)^2 = x^2y^2 - 3xy(x+y) + \tfrac94(x^2+y^2) + \tfrac{11}2xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac14.$$ Therefore $$g(x,y) = \biggl(\frac{xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac12}{x+y-1}\biggr)^2 - \frac14,$$ so that $g(x,y)$ has lower bound $-\frac14$, attained when $x = y = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

The same argument applies to the other two cyclically symmetric functions $g(y,z)$ and $g(z,x)$. So the minimum value of $f(x,y,z) = g(x,y) + g(y,z) + g(z,x)$ is $-\frac34$, attained when $x = y = z = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

[/sp]
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
[sp]
Let $f(x,y,z) = \frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2}+\frac{(y^2+z)(z^2+y)}{(y+z-1)^2}+\frac{(z^2+x)(x^2+z)}{(x+z-1)^2}-2(x+y+z)$. Then $f(x,y,z)$ is the cyclically symmetric sum of three functions of two variables, one of which is $g(x,y) = \dfrac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x)}{(x+y-1)^2} - (x+y)$.

It seems like a good guess that $g(x,y)$ will be minimised when $y=x$ (and no doubt MarkFL would produce a "cyclic symmetry" argument to justify that). But $$g(x,x) = \frac{(x^2+x)^2 - 2x(2x-1)^2}{(2x-1)^2} = \frac{x^4 - 6x^3 + 9x^2 -2x}{(2x-1)^2} = \frac{\bigl(x^2 - 3x + \frac12\bigr)^2 - \frac14(2x-1)^2}{(2x-1)^2} = \biggl(\frac{x^2 - 3x + \frac12}{2x-1}\biggr)^2 - \frac14.$$ That has a lower bound of $-\frac14$, attained when $x$ is a root of $x^2 - 3x + \frac12$, namely $x = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

So the next step is to see whether $-\frac14$ is a lower bound for $g(x,y)$. In fact, $$g(x,y) + \frac14 = \frac{(x^2+y)(y^2+x) - \bigl(x+y-\frac14 \bigr)(x+y-1)^2}{(x+y-1)^2} = \frac{x^2y^2 - 3xy(x+y) + \frac94(x^2+y^2) + \frac{11}2xy - \frac32(x+y) + \frac14}{(x+y-1)^2}.$$ But polarising the expression in the above calculation for $g(x,x)$ gives exactly the numerator of that fraction, namely $$\bigl(xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac12\bigr)^2 = x^2y^2 - 3xy(x+y) + \tfrac94(x^2+y^2) + \tfrac{11}2xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac14.$$ Therefore $$g(x,y) = \biggl(\frac{xy - \tfrac32(x+y) + \tfrac12}{x+y-1}\biggr)^2 - \frac14,$$ so that $g(x,y)$ has lower bound $-\frac14$, attained when $x = y = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

The same argument applies to the other two cyclically symmetric functions $g(y,z)$ and $g(z,x)$. So the minimum value of $f(x,y,z) = g(x,y) + g(y,z) + g(z,x)$ is $-\frac34$, attained when $x = y = z = \frac12(3\pm\sqrt7).$

[/sp]

Thankyou, Opalg, for your exemplary analytical solution. You even solved the problem without using the "cyclic symmetry" argument! ;) Great!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top