Maximizing Functions with Legendre Transforms

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of Legendre transforms in thermodynamics, specifically in constructing natural functions of the variables (1/T, V, n) and (1/T, V, μ/T). The key equations include the first law of thermodynamics, expressed as dU = T dS - p dV + μ dN, and the derivation of the entropy differential dS = (1/T) dU + (p/T) dV - (μ/T) dN. The participants clarify how to use Legendre transformations to redefine thermodynamic potentials, leading to the grand-canonical potential Ω = X + αN, where α = μ/T, with natural independent variables being (β, V, N).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic laws, particularly the first law of thermodynamics.
  • Familiarity with Legendre transforms and their application in physics.
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic potentials such as internal energy (U), entropy (S), and grand-canonical potential (Ω).
  • Basic calculus skills, particularly in partial derivatives and total differentials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the first law of thermodynamics in detail.
  • Learn about Legendre transforms and their role in thermodynamic potentials.
  • Explore the concept of grand-canonical ensembles in statistical mechanics.
  • Investigate the relationship between thermodynamic variables and their natural independent variables.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the mathematical formulation of physical laws.

kd215
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Trying an example from a textbook but I don't understand Legendre transform at all. "construct Legendre transforms of the entropy that are natural functions of (1/T, V, n) and (1/T, V, μ/T)". I don't really understand where to start. An example prior to this exercise just states: A = E - TS = A(T,V,n) ; and G = E - TS - (-PV) = E - TS +PV = G(T,P,N).

If someone explains how the examples used Legendre transforms that should be enough for me to figure out the entropy problem. Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
You always start from the first and second law of thermodynamics, i.e.,
[tex]\mathrm{d}U=T \mathrm{d} S-p \mathrm{d} V+\mu \mathrm{d} N.[/tex]
Here, [itex]U[/itex] is the internal energy, [itex]T[/itex] the temperature, [itex]S[/itex] the entropy, [itex]p[/itex] the pressure, [itex]V[/itex] the volume, [itex]\mu[/itex] the chemical potential, and [itex]N[/itex] a (conserved!) particle-number like quantity. In nonrelativistic physics often you can take [itex]N[/itex] as the particle number itself, while in non-relativistic physics usually there are only conserved charges like elecctric charge, net-baryon number, etc. Here, we just consider the case of one such particle-number like quantities and thus only one chemical potential. The generalization to more variables is straight forward.

The above equation shows that the "natural" independent variables for the internal energy are [itex]S[/itex], [itex]V[/itex], and [itex]N[/itex]. Since by construction [itex]\mathrm{d} U[/itex] is a total differential, you read off relations like
[tex]\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial S} \right)_{V,N}=T.[/tex]
Here, the variables listed in the subscript indicate which variables have to be kept constant when differentiating. It's pretty important in this business to keep track of what's left constant when taking partial derivatives of the various quantities. Since from [itex]U[/itex] you can derive other quantities by taking partial derivatives one calls [itex]U[/itex] a thermodynamical potential, and which other quantities you get by taking derivatives in the most straight-forward way is determined by what are the "natural" independent quantities to use as explained above.

Let's now look at the entropy. From the equation above we get
[tex]\mathrm{d} S=\frac{1}{T} \mathrm{d} U+\frac{p}{T} \mathrm{d} V-\frac{\mu}{T} \mathrm{d}N.[/tex]
The "natural" independent variables to be used together with the entropy are thus [itex]U[/itex], [itex]V[/itex], and [itex]N[/itex], and the corresponding partial derivatives wrt. to one of these three variables (keeping precisely the other two fixed) are the coefficients in front of the differentials. Again we use the argument that [itex]S[/itex] is a state variable and thus [itex]\mathrm{d} S[/itex] is a total differential. For the following it's convenient to introduce new variables, namely
[tex]\beta=1/T, \quad \alpha=\mu/T.[/tex]
Then we have
[tex]\mathrm{d} S=\beta \mathrm{d} U+\frac{p}{T} \mathrm{d} V -\alpha \mathrm{d} N.[/tex]
With a Legendre transformation you define new quantities such that other variables become the "natural" independent variables. Let's start with the first example. You are supposed to find a Legendre transformation of [itex]S[/itex] such that the natural quantities become [itex](\beta,V,N)[/itex]. Now, for the enropy [itex]V[/itex] and [itex]N[/itex] are already natural variables, but not [itex]\beta[/itex], but we have the relation
[tex]\beta=\left (\frac{\partial S}{\partial U} \right )_{V,N}.[/tex]
Now to make [itex]\beta[/itex] a natural variable of another quantitiy, you simply have to define the new quantity as
[tex]X=S-\beta U[/tex]
Then from the above given differential you have
[tex]\mathrm{d} X=\mathrm{d} S - \mathrm{d}(\beta U)=\mathrm{d} S - U \mathrm{d} \beta-\beta \mathrm{d}U = \frac{p}{T} \mathrm{d} V-\alpha \mathrm{d} N-U \mathrm{d} \beta.[/tex]
Now obviously the natural variables for [itex]X[/itex] are indeed [itex](\beta,V,N)[/itex].

As next step you want still a new quantity such that the natural variables are [itex]\beta,V,N[/itex]. Now you read off the last equation
[tex]\left (\frac{\partial X}{\partial N} \right)_{\beta,V}=-\alpha.[/tex]
Thus, by another Legendre transform you see that the searched quantity must be
[tex]\Omega=X+\alpha N=S-\beta U+\alpha N[/tex]
since this leads to
[tex]\mathrm{d} \Omega=\frac{p}{T} \mathrm{d} V+N \mathrm{d} \alpha-U \mathrm{d} \beta.[/tex]
That's the grand-canonical potential with the natural independent variables [itex]V, \quad \beta, \quad \alpha[/itex].
 
The goal is to make a new function, [itex]\tilde{f}(p)[/itex], of a new variable, [itex]p[/itex], and, in doing so maximize
[tex] xp-f(x)[/tex]
for a given value of [itex]x[/itex]. To maximize anything we have drilled in us to take the derivative and set it equal to zero
[tex] xp-f(x)\implies p=\frac{df(x)}{dx}\equiv g(x)[/tex]
where I renamed the derivative as a new function, [itex]g(x)[/itex]. Now we are interested in the [itex]x[/itex] that maximizes the first expression, so we solve for [itex]x[/itex]
[tex] x=g^{-1}(p)[/tex]
then
[tex] \tilde{f}(p)=p \, g^{-1}(p) - f \left( g^{-1}(p) \right)[/tex]
this is the new function. Now let's start with the expression for [itex]p[/itex].
[tex] p=\frac{df}{dx}\implies p \, dx = df \implies d(px) - x \, dp = df \implies d(xp-f) = x \, dp[/tex]
which is true by looking back to the first part. So you can revert back and forth between [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]p[/itex] with this little "reverse product rule" move. You can try it on your thermodynamic pair of choice. Like [itex]TdS = d(TS) - S \, dT[/itex] and you can reshuffle the total differentials to make it look nice :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K