Maximizing Toboggan Speed: Calculating Slope and Adjusting for Weight and Dips

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zoltar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To achieve a speed of 40 mph on a toboggan, a height change of approximately 209 meters is required, calculated using the formula Δh = (v²)/(2g). The weight of the toboggan does not affect the acceleration due to gravity, meaning the slope required remains constant regardless of weight. Adjustments for dips in the hill depend on factors such as friction between the toboggan and snow, as well as air resistance, making empirical testing necessary for precise calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy principles
  • Basic knowledge of right-angled trigonometry
  • Familiarity with the physics of motion and acceleration
  • Knowledge of factors affecting friction and air resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of friction on toboggan speed on various snow types
  • Learn about air resistance and its impact on sledding dynamics
  • Conduct empirical experiments to measure speed variations with different slopes
  • Explore advanced physics concepts related to motion and energy conservation
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, engineers, outdoor sports enthusiasts, and anyone interested in optimizing toboggan performance and speed calculations.

zoltar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i need help, i need to calculate the slope of a hill to reach 40mph on a toboggan? how do i do this with a fluctuating toboggan weight...meaning what is the slope i require for different weights? also how would i adjust for dips in the hill?

can anyone help? this is not might area and would appreciate something simple that i could use.

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

zoltar said:
i need help, i need to calculate the slope of a hill to reach 40mph on a toboggan? how do i do this with a fluctuating toboggan weight...meaning what is the slope i require for different weights?

Hi zoltar ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Acceleration is what matters, and as Galileo proved (on a slope, by the way), all weights have the same acceleration under gravity.

So the weight doesn't matter. :smile:
also how would i adjust for dips in the hill?

Not following you … what sort of dips? :confused:
 
It's not so simple.

It depends on the friction of the toboggan on the snow - which depends on the design of the toboggan, and the quality and temperature of the snow.

And then it also depends on the air resistance of the toboggan and its rider(s).

So there isn't a simple formula that will give the right answer. You're probably better conducting an empirical experiment (trying it out for real, and seeing what results you get).
 
It is relatively simple if you assume no air resistance/friction etc. But it will depend on how much space you have and how quickly you want to reach your target speed.

\frac{1}{2}m (\Delta v)^{2} = mg \Delta h (kinetic energy gained = gravitational potential energy lost)

\Delta h = \frac{v^{2}}{2g}


= \frac{(40*1.6)^{2}}{2*9.8} = 209m

So you will need a height change of 209m to achieve 40mph. Now you can calculate, using right-angled-trigonometry and knowledge of the space available, the angles you'd need to achieve this. Note this is just an approximation of course.
 
quark1005 said:
= \frac{(40*1.6)^{2}}{2*9.8} = 209m

So you will need a height change of 209m to achieve 40mph. Now you can calculate, using right-angled-trigonometry and knowledge of the space available, the angles you'd need to achieve this. Note this is just an approximation of course.
One should be careful with units here. The numerator would have units if (km/hr)2 and the denominator units of m/s2, so one must apply conversion factors 3600 s/hr and 1000 m/km. In doing so, the above expression becomes,


= \frac{(40*1.6)^{2}}{2*9.8*3.6^2} = 209 / (3.6)^2 m = 16.1 m


Also, the change in kinetic energy is proportional to \Delta(v^2), not (\Delta{v})^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K