Maximum Force on a Test Mass in a Massive Ring

  • Thread starter Thread starter kraigandrews
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Ring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force on a test mass m positioned along the z-axis above a massive ring with a specified radius and mass. The force at z = 0 is determined to be zero, while at z = a, the force is calculated to be 0.354. The main challenge lies in finding the maximum force on m, with the approach suggested being to differentiate the force expression with respect to x and set the derivative to zero. There is a note of caution regarding the derivation of the force expression, specifically questioning the presence of a "2" in the formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations and following through with the differentiation process to find the maximum force.
kraigandrews
Messages
105
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A massive ring (radius = a and mass = M) lies on the xy plane. Calculate the force F on a test mass m at position z on the z axis.
Now assume a = 1 and GMm/a2 = 1 in some system of units.

(a) What is the force on m at z = 0?
I got the answer for this its 0
(b) What is the force on m at z = a?
the answer for this is 0.354
(c) What is the maximum force on m ?
I am stuck on this one.


Homework Equations



F=(GMm)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



after some work I get F=(2GmMx)/(x^2+a^2)^3/2
i know this is right because i got part b from it, however i don't Know how to find the maximum, my gut feeling is take the derivative with respect to x and set it equal to zero and then solve for x and plug back into F
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kraigandrews said:
after some work I get F=(2GmMx)/(x^2+a^2)^3/2
i know this is right because i got part b from it, however i don't Know how to find the maximum, my gut feeling is take the derivative with respect to x and set it equal to zero and then solve for x and plug back into F

I'm not sure where that "2" comes from in your force expression. Better check that derivation.

And yes, you need to differentiate and solve as you've outlined.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top