Maximum number of possilities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GENIERE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
GENIERE
My math is limited to that taken in an engineering curriculum many years ago.

I hope someone might help me on this:

A statement I'm not sure is correct, followed by a question I’m not sure is properly posed.

It must always be possible to add another imaginary coin to an imaginary pile. If one tosses this pile into the air there is a possibility that all coins will land “heads up”. It follows that there is always less than an infinite number of possibilities.

If above is true, is there some maximum number of all possible outcomes?

This question arises due to an article I read recently, wherein the author stated something like “in a given Hubbell volume…. 10^118 is the maximum number of possibilities”. I can’t recall where I read it, nor the exact statement.

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For coin tossing (assuming all coins are the same), when there are n coins, there are n+1 possibilities (no. heads from 0 to n). The probabilities are given by the binomial distribution.

If there are n different coins then the number of possibilities is 2n.

In either case, the number of possibilities is finite.
 
All integers (indeed all real numbers) are finite but there are an infinite number of them: in addition they have no upper bound.

As to “in a given Hubbell volume…. 10^118 is the maximum number of possibilities", I can't help you because I don't know what a Hubble volume is nor what "possibilities are being enumerated.
 
http://www.floatingplanet.net/planetp2/archives/000225.html is one of the few references I can find that may have some bearing.

I think he mean's Hubble Volume.
 
There was a Scientific American article regarding something of this sort (by Max Tegmark).

I think the point of the number of possibilities was that, if each Hubble volume contains fields that cannot escape from it (hence are confined and quantized) and if spacetime itself is quantized, then there is a countable number of configurations you can have for all the fields contained in a Hubble volume. Then, assuming that all Hubble volumes have a random selection of values for these fields, he computed the distance at which we would be able to find another universe (hubble volume) with the exact same state as ours.
 
Thanks for the responses!

Ahrkron - Yes that was the article I was trying to read while everyone was grabbing their luggage. I misread it and inferred 10^118 as a mathematical restraint on possibilities rather than a physical restraint.

It was bugging me ever since.

Regards
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top