Maximum power transfer and kirchoffs

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Kirchhoff's laws and the Maximum Power Transfer theorem in the context of calculating the load resistance (RL) in a circuit. Participants are exploring how to find RL using Kirchhoff's laws and how to apply the Maximum Power Transfer theorem to maximize power transfer in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about whether to calculate the resistance of the load (RL) or the current in the load (RL) for the maximum power transfer calculation.
  • Another participant points out inconsistencies in the calculations presented, specifically regarding the units of current and voltage.
  • Some participants suggest using Thevenin's theorem to simplify the circuit before applying the Maximum Power Transfer theorem.
  • There is a repeated assertion that finding the Thevenin equivalent is necessary before determining the optimal load resistance for maximum power transfer.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the relationship between Kirchhoff's laws and the Maximum Power Transfer theorem, questioning if they can directly use Kirchhoff's laws to find RL.
  • One participant mentions salvaging previous calculations and seeks clarification on how to calculate the voltage output without a load.
  • There are discussions about measuring voltage across specific components and determining the open circuit voltage (Vth) for the Thevenin equivalent.
  • Participants engage in calculations to find the short circuit current (Isc) and the Thevenin resistance based on their circuit analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the Thevenin equivalent is necessary for applying the Maximum Power Transfer theorem, but there is disagreement on the initial approach to finding the load resistance (RL) and the role of Kirchhoff's laws in this process. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to calculate RL.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the application of Kirchhoff's laws versus Thevenin's theorem, indicating a potential misunderstanding of circuit analysis techniques. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented.

  • #31
gneill said:
Looks good.

Ok we are getting there lol I just need a clue how to work out I1 as I believe I need that for the ISC?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Andrew187 said:
Ok we are getting there lol I just need a clue how to work out I1 as I believe I need that for the ISC?

:confused: Are you going to find the equivalent resistance from your diagram, or go the Isc route?

When determining the Thevenin equivalent you want to determine the Thevenin voltage Vth (the open circuit voltage, which you've done), and the Thevenin resistance. The Thevenin resistance can be found in two ways: 1) determine the short circuit current Isc for the network and divide Vth by Isc, or 2) suppress the sources and determine the equivalent resistance of the network looking back into it from the output.

In this case, I think the second method looks simpler as it's a pretty basic network with opportunities for simplification.
 
  • #33
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0
 
  • #34
Andrew187 said:
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

yes, and so,...
 
  • #35
gneill said:
yes, and so,...

I2 = 0.81a?
 
  • #36
Andrew187 said:
I2 = 0.81a?

Yes. Carry on,... what's the Thevenin resistance?
 
  • #37
gneill said:
Yes. Carry on,... what's the Thevenin resistance?

7.032v/0.81a=8.68 ohm ?
 
  • #38
Andrew187 said:
7.032v/0.81a=8.68 ohm ?

Yes. Carry on... draw the Thevenin equivalent circuit with the load RL attached. What value of RL maximizes the power transfer (Max Power theorem).
 
  • #39
gneill said:
Yes. Carry on... draw the Thevenin equivalent circuit with the load RL attached. What value of RL maximizes the power transfer (Max Power theorem).

That bits not the problem I don't know how I worked out the value for I1 and how I got Isc to 0.81a
 
  • #40
Andrew187 said:
That bits not the problem I don't know how I worked out the value for I1 and how I got Isc to 0.81a

:confused:
You wrote the equations for the circuit with the output shorted and solved for the current I2, which is identical to Isc... If there's some part that you didn't understand, stop and ask before moving on.
 
  • #41
gneill said:
yes, and so,...

Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

This Is the bit I didn't understand i took this out of my notes I know here that the value of I2=0.293a, but I didn't quite understand how I worked out I1.
 
  • #42
Andrew187 said:
Isc=
(9+25)*i1 - 25*i2 = 15
-25*i1 + (25+7)*i2 = 0

This Is the bit I didn't understand i took this out of my notes I know here that the value of I2=0.293a, but I didn't quite understand how I worked out I1.

Can you be more specific about what you don't understand? You have written two equations in two unknowns, which can be solved using whatever technique you're familiar with. What part is stumping you?

1. Writing the equations from the circuit.
2. Solving two equations for two unknowns.
 
  • #43
gneill said:
Can you be more specific about what you don't understand? You have written two equations in two unknowns, which can be solved using whatever technique you're familiar with. What part is stumping you?

1. Writing the equations from the circuit.
2. Solving two equations for two unknowns.

Writing it shouldn't be a problem but solving the two equations from the two unknowns is a problem I know the answer but don't know how I solved it.
 
  • #44
Andrew187 said:
Writing it shouldn't be a problem but solving the two equations from the two unknowns is a problem I know the answer but don't know how I solved it.

Then it sounds like you need to review your algebra and simultaneous equation solving. This is a fundamental skill that you must have in order to solve problems in any technical discipline. A web search on "solving simultaneous equations" will turn up some on-line tutorials.
 
  • #45
gneill said:
Then it sounds like you need to review your algebra and simultaneous equation solving. This is a fundamental skill that you must have in order to solve problems in any technical discipline. A web search on "solving simultaneous equations" will turn up some on-line tutorials.

Sorry what I was meant to say was solving the equation isn't really the problem because I can sit till the cow's come home calculating the unknowns I eventually get there but the bit I struggle with is writing the equations and drawing the correct diagram, because when I try to look at notes and books its always done differrent to the way in which I want to achieve. So This is where I am at, I have found the value of RL I also know the unknowns but I 'm not sure what format and what diagrams to use bearing in mind I have used kirchhoffs and thevenins equivalent I think.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • #46
Andrew187 said:
Sorry what I was meant to say was solving the equation isn't really the problem because I can sit till the cow's come home calculating the unknowns I eventually get there but the bit I struggle with is writing the equations and drawing the correct diagram, because when I try to look at notes and books its always done differrent to the way in which I want to achieve. So This is where I am at, I have found the value of RL I also know the unknowns but I 'm not sure what format and what diagrams to use bearing in mind I have used kirchhoffs and thevenins equivalent I think.

If I may be frank with you, Andrew187, I get the impression from the way this thread has progressed that you don't really have an adequate grasp on any of the techniques or concepts required to solve the problem, or even a solid understanding of the problem itself (what steps are required to determine which result). You should probably look for some tutorials to firm up your fundamentals.
 
  • #47
Thevenine req

i have tried to short both bateries for finding rth but i can't understand how to solve to find rth... can someone please help me finding rth..
 

Attachments

  • Fullscreen capture 4152013 42310 AM.bmp.jpg
    Fullscreen capture 4152013 42310 AM.bmp.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 460
  • #48
hussain bani said:
i have tried to short both bateries for finding rth but i can't understand how to solve to find rth... can someone please help me finding rth..

You should have started a new thread with your question. By asking a new question at the end of an already existing thread, you have "hijacked" someone else's thread.

Hopefully, a moderator will split this off to a new thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K