Maximum Speed on a Banked Curve with Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum speed a car can take on a banked curve with friction. The initial calculations incorrectly considered only the normal force without accounting for the gravitational force acting on the car. After reevaluating, the correct approach involves combining the maximum frictional force and the gravitational force along the incline. The revised calculations yield a maximum speed of 29.0 m/s, although there is uncertainty about the correctness of the provided answer of 34.5 m/s. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering all forces acting on the car in such physics problems.
Jacky Lee
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A concrete highway curve of radius 70 m is banked at a 15° angle. What is the maximum speed with which a 1500 kg rubber tired car can take this curve without sliding? The static friction coefficient is 1.

Homework Equations


Centripetal Force = ## (m v^2) / r ##
Maximum Friction Force = ## μN ##

The Attempt at a Solution


## (m v^2) / r ## = centripetal force

Friction_max = 1 * normal force = ## 9.8 * 1500 * cos(15) = 14199.11 N ##

Plug back into equation:

## (1500 v^2) / 70 = 14199.11 ##

Which yields v = 25.7 m/s

However, the answer is 34.5 m/s. What am I doing wrong? I don't understand where I am going wrong in my steps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that the normal force is the only force you have to worry about? No other forces? None at all?
 
I mean the frictional force
 
AlephNumbers said:
Are you sure that the normal force is the only force you have to worry about? No other forces? None at all?

I figured that when the centripetal force exceeds the maximum frictional force, the car would skid. Solving for the maximum frictional force only requires the normal force, so I didn't include any other forces. Where would I have to use the friction force?
 
Look, I phrased that statement poorly. Reevaluate the forces acting on the car tire.
 
Everything else is correct, your steps, your concept of friction, all correct.
 
Forces on the tires: friction, normal, centripetal

Am I missing anything?
 
Yes. Yes, you are missing something very important. A force that is in every inclined plane problem you have ever seen...
 
Ignore the centripetal forces. Just think about a tire on an incline. What forces act on it?
 
  • #10
AlephNumbers said:
Ignore the centripetal forces. Just think about a tire on an incline. What forces act on it?

OH, I'm missing gravity, aren't I?
 
  • #11
I do believe you are.
 
  • #12
AlephNumbers said:
I do believe you are.

Hmm, I still don't get the right answer. I tried adding the force of gravity in the direction of the incline to the frictional force (which would just double it), so I got:

## (m v^2) / r = 28398.22 ##
## (1500 v^2 / 70) = 28398.22 ##
## v = 36.4 ##
 
  • #13
Don't just give me numbers. Keep it symbolic. What are the two factors that make up the 28398.22N?
 
  • #14
The gravitational force directed down the incline would not be cosθmg
 
  • #15
AlephNumbers said:
Don't just give me numbers. Keep it symbolic. What are the two factors that make up the 28398.22N?

I made an error, it should be 18003.75N

Maximum Frictional Force: ## 9.8 * 1500 * cos(15) = 14199.11 ##
Force due to gravity: ## 9.8 * 1500 * sin(15) = 3804.64 ##
Added together: ## 14199.11 + 3804.64 = 18003.75 N ##

## (m v^2) / r = 18003.75 ##
## (1500 v^2 / 70) = 18003.75##
## v = 29.0 m/s ##
 
  • #16
I would wait until you have the solution to start plugging numbers in. You made a sign error.
 
  • #17
AlephNumbers said:
I would wait until you have the solution to start plugging numbers in. You made a sign error.

Should the friction force be negative?

Even if I changed the sign on any of the numbers, my answer would still be incorrect. If I change the sign on either forces, I would get a smaller number and therefore a smaller velocity as an answer.
 
  • #18
You are right. Your solution above looks good. I think that you either made a calculation mistake, or that the answer you claim is correct, is not actually correct.
 
  • #19
AlephNumbers said:
You are right. Your solution above looks good. I think that you either made a calculation mistake, or that the answer you claim is correct, is not actually correct.

Hmm, okay. Thank you for all the help! :) I really appreciate it.
 
  • #20
Any time.
 
Back
Top