B Maximum weight of a Neutron star

AI Thread Summary
The maximum weight of a neutron star is estimated at 2.16 solar masses, with any additional mass potentially leading to black hole formation. The accuracy of this figure is within a few percent, which could imply a significant margin of error. Theoretical models suggest that neutron stars typically have upper mass limits below 3 solar masses, with some models proposing limits as high as 5 solar masses under specific conditions. The stability of a rotating neutron star may allow it to exceed the mass of a stationary one before collapsing. Overall, anything exceeding 3 solar masses is unlikely to remain stable for long.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180116093650.htm

This article gives a maximum weight of 2.16 solar masses, and an infinitesimal addition would turn it into a Black hole. I can not find a paper to support this article so do you think it is correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
"an infinitesimal addition would turn it into a Black hole."

Be careful about reading more into an article or paper than is actually there. The article says "with an accuracy of a few percent". A few percent could mean 5% and 5% of 2.16 solar masses is about 0.1 solar masses, hardly an infinitesimal amount.
 
It depends on what Equation of State you use.I prefer a very "stiff" equation of state strictly constrained by the Pauli Exclusion Principle applied to neutrons. Given a neutron star at neutron densities a neutron star of about 5 solar masses would turn into a black hole, so this is the upper mass limit for a neutron star I would use.
 
NFuller said:
The paper is linked at the bottom of the page http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aaa401/meta

The result is reasonable since theoretical constructions tend to give a maximum mass of less than 3 solar masses.

No need for login at arxive.org. Title and a few authors usually pops up a link.

ianchristie said:
"an infinitesimal addition would turn it into a Black hole."

Be careful about reading more into an article or paper than is actually there. The article says "with an accuracy of a few percent". A few percent could mean 5% and 5% of 2.16 solar masses is about 0.1 solar masses, hardly an infinitesimal amount.

Consider what happens if you step over the edge of a cliff. I could tell you to "watch out for the pit over yonder... about 200 meters ±10m". You can walk up to the edge of a pit and stick your toes over and wiggle them. The ±10m uncertainty in my statement was the location. At the edge a small fraction of a step will lead to a a serious accident. Dancing 5 meters from a fall hazard would not be dangerous.
 
It depends.
Rotating neutron star would be stabilized by its angular momentum and could be significantly heavier than stationary one before collapse proceeds. One way or another it is unlikely that anything over 3 solar masses would last for long.
 
  • Like
Likes JMz
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top