May I know the answer for this with respect to

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dimension10
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence and evaluation of the series \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\frac{t}{2n}-\arctan(\frac{2t}{4n+1})). Participants clarify that the series diverges unless t=0 and emphasize the importance of convergence criteria when dealing with divergent series. The Riemann-Siegel Theta function is identified as a related concept, with the series converging under specific conditions. Techniques involving integral representations and the use of Mathematica for evaluation are suggested as potential methods for approximating the series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with the Riemann-Siegel Theta function
  • Knowledge of integral calculus and series manipulation
  • Experience with mathematical software such as Mathematica
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of the Riemann-Siegel Theta function
  • Learn about series convergence tests, particularly the integral test
  • Investigate the use of Mathematica for series evaluation and manipulation
  • Study the Gamma function and its integral representations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus, and researchers interested in series convergence and special functions will benefit from this discussion.

dimension10
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
May I know the answer for this with respect to t:

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\frac{t}{2n}-\arctan(\frac{2t}{4n+1}))

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Can I just expand the series as:
<br /> \frac{t}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\tan^{-1}\frac{2t}{4n+1}<br />
and the first term is infinite unless t=0.
 


hunt_mat said:
Can I just expand the series as:
<br /> \frac{t}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n}-\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\tan^{-1}\frac{2t}{4n+1}<br />
and the first term is infinite unless t=0.

No, that won't work. A difference of two divergent series may be divergent. A simple example is

\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty}{\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n}}

I can show that the series of the OP converges using the integral test. But it seems that the OP wants the exact value of the series. I have no clue how to calculate that...
 


I have an idea, but I don't know where to go with it yet; try finding an expression whose derivative or integral is t/2n - arctan(2t/(4n+1)) and make that a function of t, and try to solve with power series manipulations.
 


micromass said:
No, that won't work. A difference of two divergent series may be divergent. A simple example is

There is no such thing as a difference between two divergent series. (sum 1/n) - (sum 1/n) and sum (1/n -1/n) are two very different things (the first one does not make sense at all).

The equivalence (sum a_n) + (sum b_n) = sum (a_n+b_n) is true (and makes sense) if and only if the sums exists (that is, converges).
 


Using a calculator, I got infinity
 


Writing t/(2n)-arctan(2*t/(4n+1)) as a series in t and then summing each coefficient as a series in n (in Maple) gives
(2-3/2*ln(2)-1/4*Pi)*t-1/48*Psi(2,5/4)*t^3+1/3840*Psi(4,5/4)*t^5-1/645120*Psi(6,5/4)*t^7+1/185794560*Psi(8,5/4)*t^9+O(t^11)
Psi(n,x) is the nth derivative of Psi(x), so it seems possible that the series may be expressible in terms of Psi(x). At least, this method might give you a reasonable approximation to the original series. I haven't thought carefully about the convergence issues, but I believe the original series does converge.
 


Donsig said:
Writing t/(2n)-arctan(2*t/(4n+1)) as a series in t and then summing each coefficient as a series in n (in Maple) gives
(2-3/2*ln(2)-1/4*Pi)*t-1/48*Psi(2,5/4)*t^3+1/3840*Psi(4,5/4)*t^5-1/645120*Psi(6,5/4)*t^7+1/185794560*Psi(8,5/4)*t^9+O(t^11)
Psi(n,x) is the nth derivative of Psi(x), so it seems possible that the series may be expressible in terms of Psi(x). At least, this method might give you a reasonable approximation to the original series. I haven't thought carefully about the convergence issues, but I believe the original series does converge.

t is a constant.

Anyway, I realized it should converge. It is related to the Riemann-Siegel Theta function.

\theta (t) = - \frac{t\, \gamma + t\;\mbox{ln}\: \pi}{2}-\arctan 2t + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\frac{t}{2n}-\arctan\frac{2t}{4n+1})

and this theta function does converge, at least when the Z-function is concerned.
 


dimension10 said:
t is a constant.

Anyway, I realized it should converge. It is related to the Riemann-Siegel Theta function.

\theta (t) = - \frac{t\, \gamma + t\;\mbox{ln}\: \pi}{2}-\arctan 2t + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(\frac{t}{2n}-\arctan\frac{2t}{4n+1})

and this theta function does converge, at least when the Z-function is concerned.

Put

\arctan\frac{2t}{4n+1} = \int_0^t \frac{2(4n+1)}{(4n+1)^2+4x^2}dx

and interchanging the sum and integral and using Mathematica gives

\int_0^t \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2n} -\frac{2(4n+1)}{(4n+1)^2+4x^2} dx<br /> = \frac{\gamma t}{2} + \frac{1}{2i}(\log\Gamma(5/4+it/2)-\log\Gamma(5/4-it/2))

It should be possible to put the solution in real form, for example with the right integral representation of log(Gamma).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K