Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!


  1. Jan 26, 2006 #1
    I can't seem to find a definitive equation for calculation of LLD (lower limit of detection). Cember has one equation, and other sources I research have completely different equations. I'm more apt to go with Cember's equation ,especially seeing as many of the govermental guides have conflicting equations. I know sometimes the equation can be application specific, so mostly wipes for contamination (whether routine wipes or decommission wipes) is the equation I'm looking for.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 26, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Is this for homework problem or laboratory measurement problem?

    LLD would depend on the type of detector and radiation. Are you using a 2[itex]\pi[/itex] detector?
  4. Jan 26, 2006 #3
    Neither. It's for the job. Apparently, some idiot used the wrong formular for the MDA way back when, and no one in the office can seem to find the correct formula. If we could find another that agrees with Cember, we'd most likely go with that one.
  5. Jan 26, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    :rofl: Yep, I've seen that many times before. Something that someone did 20, 30, 40+ years ago, and that person has long since gone (terminated, retired or died), and no one knows why it was done that way. The stories I could tell. :rolleyes:

    I'll look around. I have an old Cember. You might try Glenn Knolls book, and IIRC there is a Radiation Protection Handbook or Radiological Health Handbook.
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2006
  6. Jan 26, 2006 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Try these resources

    http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q807.html [Broken]

    http://www.eml.doe.gov/publications/procman/ [Broken]

    http://www.eml.doe.gov/publications/procman/Sect4/4_5-3.pdf [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  7. Jan 27, 2006 #6
    Thanks. I meant to look at the HP website but it completely slipped my mind. DOH!
  8. Jan 27, 2006 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Dearly Missed


    Yes, the Health Physics Society is a great place for people to get answers to their
    questions with regard to health effects and safety of nuclear technology.

    I referred several anti-nukes who were trying to stir up support for "The Tooth Fairy Project".
    I pointed them to:

    http://www.hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q616.html [Broken]

    The Tooth Fairy Project is an attempt to assign blame to nuclear power plants for
    trace amounts of Strontium-90 found in the deciduous teeth [ "baby teeth" ] of
    children from a given area.

    The "study" is terribly flawed as discussed by numerous scientists at:


    For example, Bob Flood of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center at Stanford
    University concludes the following:

    "...Ignoring such things as transport mechanisms and food chain
    characteristics and jumping straight to assigning blame to nuclear
    power plants seems a fair demonstration to the preconceived notions
    the project started with. They had the answer before they started;
    they are now simply deriving the question..."

    Dr. Gregory Greenman
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  9. Feb 24, 2009 #8
    Hello Astronuc, Your verbal explanation of LLD clarified so much for me. I was searching for a similar definition for MDA. If it helps, I use a Protean gas-flow proportional counter to quantify gross beta-gamma.
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2009
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook