Mean Current of Photomultiplier at anode

sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A weak light source (wavelength 600 nm, mean power 66.2 pW) falls on a multiplier tube with a cascade of 8 dynodes. How large is the mean current at the anode with an amplification of 108 and a 50% quantum efficiency for the photoelectric effect.

Homework Equations


E_{kin} = h\nu - W

The Attempt at a Solution



No. of incident photons = No. of electrons emitted ??
N_{\gamma} = N_{e}
\frac{P * t * λ}{h * c} = \frac{66.2pW * 1s * 600nm}{h*c} = 1.66E29 (in one second)

average current produced at first dynode = I0

I_{0} = \frac{dq}{dt} = \frac{N_{e} * e}{1s} = 3.201E-11A

Then this is amplified by a factor 108 to give final average current at anode

I = I_{0} * 1E8 = 3.201E-3A

well, that was my idea but I don't see how the 50% efficiency fits into this. spot my mistake anyone?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The mistake is right in the first line i.e the number of incident photons =no of electrons emitted. You should use the quantum efficiency to calcualte that, i.e no. of photoelectrons=no of incident photons *Quantum efficiency . It is usually a function of the incident wavelength.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top