Mean Occupation Number of Non-interacting quantum fluids

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
Hi, I get two contradicting sections of the book "Concepts in Thermal Physics":

Earlier in the section they used the grand partition function to derive the mean occupation number ##<n_i> = -\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial ln Z}{\partial E_i}##

Later in the section, they said ##<n_k> = \frac{1}{\beta}\frac{\partial Z_k}{\partial \mu}##

Why does the first expression take the differential of ##ln Z## and the second expression simply takes the differential of ##Z##?

mbu0yf.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it helps, it was earlier defined that ##Z = \Pi_i\left( 1 \pm e^{\beta(\mu - E_i)}\right)^{\pm 1}##
 
bumpp
 
It should be ln Z, it's just an error in the book. And the author is aware of it already, see this errata.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top