Mean value theorem for integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) for integrals, which states that for a continuous function f(x) on the interval [a, b], there exists a point c in [a, b] such that the integral of f from a to b equals f(c) multiplied by the width of the interval (b-a). Participants clarify that this theorem provides an "average height" representation of the area under the curve. Additionally, they explore the integral of e^(x^2) from 0 to 2, which lacks an elementary antiderivative, and discuss using Taylor series expansion to approximate the integral, yielding values around 16.4526 with infinite terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mean Value Theorem for integrals
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their applications
  • Experience with numerical approximation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Mean Value Theorem for integrals in detail
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their convergence
  • Explore numerical integration techniques such as Simpson's Rule
  • Investigate the properties of the function e^(x^2) and its behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in integral theorems, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of numerical methods for evaluating integrals.

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a couple of questions.

First, about the mean value theorem for integrals. I don't get it. The theorem say that if f(x) is continuous in [a,b] then there exist a point c in [a,b] such that

\[\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx=f(c)\cdot (b-a)\]

Now, I understand what it means (I think), but don't get the intuition (unlike the mean value theorem which is very intuitive). The integral is the area under f(x) between a and b. So how come it is equal to the height of f(x) at the point c, multiplied by the width ? How come there is a point c that represent the "average height" ?

The second question, I need to approximately evaluate

\[\int_{0}^{2}e^{x^{2}}dx\]

the answer is [2,2e^4], don't know why...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello all,

I have a couple of questions.

The second question, I need to approximately evaluate

\[\int_{0}^{2}e^{x^{2}}dx\]

the answer is [2,2e^4], don't know why...

The function $\displaystyle y=e^{x^{2}}$ doesn't have an elementary antiderivative, but a way to solve the integral is to use the Taylor expansion... $\displaystyle e^{x^{2}} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2 n}}{n!}\ (1)$

... and from (1) You obtain... $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\xi} e^{x^{2}}\ dx = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\xi^{2 n + 1}}{(2n + 1)\ n!}\ (2)$ ... and a 'good' value of the integral can be obtained summin a 'large enough' number of terms of (2)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
View attachment 1160

My diagram is intended to show that \displaystyle f(0)\times (2-0)< \int_0^2 e^{x^2}dx < f(2) \times (2-0)

Can you see that \displaystyle \int_0^2 e^{x^2}dx = f(c) \times (2-0) for some c in [0,2]?
 

Attachments

  • yankel.png
    yankel.png
    2 KB · Views: 141
chisigma said:
The function $\displaystyle y=e^{x^{2}}$ doesn't have an elementary antiderivative, but a way to solve the integral is to use the Taylor expansion... $\displaystyle e^{x^{2}} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^{2 n}}{n!}\ (1)$

... and from (1) You obtain... $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\xi} e^{x^{2}}\ dx = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\xi^{2 n + 1}}{(2n + 1)\ n!}\ (2)$ ... and a 'good' value of the integral can be obtained summin a 'large enough' number of terms of (2)...

Using 'Monster Wolfram' You obtain...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2} e^{x^{2}}\ dx \sim 16.4396\ \text{with 10 terms}$

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2} e^{x^{2}}\ dx \sim 16.4515\ \text{with 12 terms}$

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{2} e^{x^{2}}\ dx \sim 16.4526\ \text{with infinite terms}$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
If you rearrange the MVT for integrals, you get that if $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$, then there exists $c\in [a,b]$ such that
$$f(c)= \frac{1}{b-a} \int_{a}^{b}f(x) \, dx.$$
In words, $f$ must achieve (LHS) its average value on $[a,b]$ (RHS). Because $f$ is continuous, it's not allowed to skip its average value on the interval. Does that help with the intuition?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K