Mean Value Theorem, Intermediate Value Theorem

fmam3
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let h be a differentiable function defined on the interval [0,3], and assume that h(0) = 1, h(1) = 2 and h(3) = 2.

(c) Argue that h'(x) = 1/4 at some point in the domain.

Homework Equations


(a) Argue that there exists a point d \in [0,3] where h(d) = d.
(b) Argue that at some point c, we have h'(c) = 1/3

The Attempt at a Solution


This question comes in 3 parts and I've already solved parts (a) and (b). Part (a) is simply by the intermediate value theorem, using the fact that differentiation implies continuity and that continuous functions have the intermediate value property. Part (b) is by the mean value theorem. So those two parts I'm fine, but I'm kind of stuck on part (c).

I'm convinced that part (c) has something to do with the mean value theorem. And tips would be appreciated here! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Do you know that the derivative f'of a differentiable function f satisfies the intermediate value theorem even though f' may not be continuous? That plus what you know...
 
LCKurtz said:
Hint: Do you know that the derivative f'of a differentiable function f satisfies the intermediate value theorem even though f' may not be continuous? That plus what you know...

Ah.. yes, I know that --- but somehow it totally escaped me when I was looking at this problem. Then this is easy!

By part (b), \exists c_1 s.t. h'(c_1) = 1/3. Applying the mean value theorem again on [1,3], \exists c_2 \in (1,3) such that h'(c_2) = \frac{h(3) - h(1)}{3 - 1} = \frac{2 - 2}{3 - 1} = 0. And since we have h'(c_2) = 0 < 1/4 < 1/3 = h'(c_1), then by the intermediate value theorem for derivatives, \exists x \in (c_1, c_2) \subseteq [0,3] s.t. h'(x) = 1/4.

Thanks again :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top