Mean velocity in a circular pipe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the mean velocity in a circular pipe under frictionless, inviscid flow conditions. The velocity profile is given as v(r) = 6 - 6r^{1.828}, with a volume flow rate of 9 m³/s and a pipe radius of 1 m. Two methods to find the mean velocity, v_{av}, yield different results: dividing flow rate by area gives 9/π, while integrating the velocity profile leads to 3.858. The discrepancy arises from the need to integrate over the cross-sectional area rather than just the radius. The correct approach involves integrating the velocity profile over the area and dividing by the total area for an accurate mean velocity calculation.
kbaumen
Messages
190
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Frictionless, inviscous flow in a circular pipe.

Velocity profile, v(r) = 6 - 6r^{1.828}
Volume flowrate, Q = 9 \frac{\text{m}^3}{\text{s}}
Pipe radius, R = 1 m
Given velocities, v(0) = 6 m/s, v(R) = 0 m/s.

Find mean velocity v_{av}

2. The attempt at a solution
If I just divide the flowrate by area, I get the correct answer - 9/\pi (correct according to the tutorial solutions anyway). It also seems to make sense.

However, if I integrate the velocity along r from 0 to R and divide everything by R, I get a different value.

<br /> v_{av} = \frac{1}{R} \int_0^R (6 - 6r^{1.828}) \mathrm{d}r = 3.858<br />

Can anyone explain the discrepancy? To me both approaches make sense but I can't work out why the results are different.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kbaumen! :smile:

for an average, shouldn't the integral be (1/πR2) ∫ 2πrdr etc ?
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kbaumen! :smile:

for an average, shouldn't the integral be (1/πR2) ∫ 2πrdr etc ?

Cheers, that actually makes sense. Integrate over area and divide by area.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top