Meaning of a reaction being "too slow to be biologically significant"?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phrase "too slow to be biologically significant," specifically regarding the auto-oxidation of nitric oxide (NO) to nitrogen dioxide (NO2). It raises the question of whether this phrase indicates a low probability of the reaction occurring, while acknowledging that the reaction does take place. The conversation also references the National Research Council's guidelines, which state that the short-term public emergency exposure limit for NO2 is 0.04 ppm, emphasizing that the toxicity of NO2 is dose-dependent, aligning with the principle that "only the dose makes the poison," attributed to Paracelsus.
asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
I'm wondering if there's a clear definition of the phrase "too slow to be biologically significant"? (in this case the reaction of the auto-oxidation of $$NO$$ to form $$NO_2$$) Does this simply mean the reaction occurs with a very low probability? Presumably the reaction does still occur - I'm wondering if there's a clear technical defintion.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Per CDC guidelines, the National Research Council's Short-term Public Emergency Guidance Level for a 24-hour exposure to NO2 is 0.04ppm (for inhalation).
The point is: Only the dose makes the poison (at least for NO2). And a thank you to 16th Century Paracelsus.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
16K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top