Meaning of a reaction being "too slow to be biologically significant"?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phrase "too slow to be biologically significant," specifically regarding the auto-oxidation of nitric oxide (NO) to nitrogen dioxide (NO2). It raises the question of whether this phrase indicates a low probability of the reaction occurring, while acknowledging that the reaction does take place. The conversation also references the National Research Council's guidelines, which state that the short-term public emergency exposure limit for NO2 is 0.04 ppm, emphasizing that the toxicity of NO2 is dose-dependent, aligning with the principle that "only the dose makes the poison," attributed to Paracelsus.
asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
I'm wondering if there's a clear definition of the phrase "too slow to be biologically significant"? (in this case the reaction of the auto-oxidation of $$NO$$ to form $$NO_2$$) Does this simply mean the reaction occurs with a very low probability? Presumably the reaction does still occur - I'm wondering if there's a clear technical defintion.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Per CDC guidelines, the National Research Council's Short-term Public Emergency Guidance Level for a 24-hour exposure to NO2 is 0.04ppm (for inhalation).
The point is: Only the dose makes the poison (at least for NO2). And a thank you to 16th Century Paracelsus.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
16K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top