Meaning of area in the Nambu Goto string action

  • Thread starter Thread starter clerk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area String
clerk
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am confused about what area is being minimised in the nambu goto action..the one in the target space or the one in the parameter space? From Zwiebach's book I think he is trying to construct the area in target space and in the process we get derivatives with respect to parameters since each co-ordinate in the target space is now a function of the two parameters.. But reading David Tong's notes, it seems he is building the area in the worldsheet rather than in target space...because he talks about pullback of the flat minkowskian metric on the worldsheet.. (by worldsheet i think he means the parameter space?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they are doing the same thing. By world sheet Tong means the image, and the pullback of the metric is the restriction to the world sheet. So in both cases it is area in the target space.
 
afaik these two concepts are strictly equivalent in differential geometry
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Back
Top