Meaning of "equatorial radius in an orbital plane"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of "equatorial radius" in the context of solving the inverse geodesic problem using a specific geodesic tool. The participants clarify that the equatorial radius likely refers to the maximum radius of an ellipsoidal central mass, similar to how the Earth's equatorial radius is larger than its polar radius. They agree that, for an ellipsoid, the equatorial radius is the distance from the center to the equator, which corresponds to the semi-major axis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometry of the ellipsoidal mass when defining these parameters. Overall, the participants conclude that the equatorial radius should be defined as the distance from the center of the ellipsoid.
M.T
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I wish to solve the inverse geodesic problem numerically using http://geographiclib.sourceforge.net/html/classGeographicLib_1_1Geodesic.html#a455300c36e6caa70968115416e1573a4, and to finish off I need to specify the "equatorial radius". I am not too familiar with this, and do not see immediately what I would define as "North" or "South" in the orbital plane.

Does the "equatorial radius" here refer to the semi-major axis, or perhaps the apocenter or pericenter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MT:

I noticed that no one has responded to your question for about a day, so I thought I would try to give a useful reply based on my my limited knowledge.

I do not understand the tool you linked to, so this is just a guess. Perhaps the tool takes into account the possibility that the central mass effecting geodesic calculations is not radially symmetric. In that case the equatorial radius may refer to the maximum radius of an ellipsoidal central mass, like the Earth's equatorial radius is larger than its polar radius.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
  • Like
Likes M.T
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi MT:

I noticed that no one has responded to your question for about a day, so I thought I would try to give a useful reply based on my my limited knowledge.

I do not understand the tool you linked to, so this is just a guess. Perhaps the tool takes into account the possibility that the central mass effecting geodesic calculations is not radially symmetric. In that case the equatorial radius may refer to the maximum radius of an ellipsoidal central mass, like the Earth's equatorial radius is larger than its polar radius.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz

Hi Buzz Bloom

Thanks for the reply.

The central mass is assumed ellipsoidal, so I agree with you in that it does not have to be radially symmetric. I guess it also makes sense to define the equator along the largest "diameter", that is ##2a ## with ## a ## being the semi-major axis, but is the radius then (1) ## a ## (distance from centre of ellipsoid) or is it (2) ## c+a ## with ## c ## being the distance from the foci where eg. the Earth is; ## c-a ## being the shortest distance between the Earth and the ellipsoid orbit, and ## c+a ## the longest distance.

would I be right then in assuming you mean the distance from the centre (1)?

Thanks,
MT
 
M.T said:
would I be right then in assuming you mean the distance from the centre (1)?
Hi MT:

Yes, except that no mean is necessary, since for an ellipsoid all points on the equator are equally distant from the center.

Regards,
Buzz
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top