Meaning of soulution of Central Equation: Nearly free electron model

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Nearly Free Electron model in solid-state physics, specifically addressing the central equation derived from the time-independent Schrödinger equation. The equation, represented as (\lambda_k - \epsilon)C_k + \Sigma_G U_G C_{k-G} = 0, involves Fourier coefficients C_k and reciprocal lattice vectors G. The participants confirm that solving this equation yields energy values ε_± = λ_k ± U_0, leading to an energy gap ε_gap = ε_+ - ε_- between two energy bands. The specific bands corresponding to this gap can be identified, and the values for C_k can be determined based on the periodicity of the potential and the wave vector k.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of Fourier coefficients in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of solid-state physics, particularly the Nearly Free Electron model
  • Basic grasp of reciprocal lattice vectors and energy band theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the central equation in the Nearly Free Electron model
  • Learn about energy band gaps and their significance in solid-state physics
  • Explore the role of Fourier coefficients in solving quantum mechanical equations
  • Read "Solid State Physics" by Ashcroft & Mermin, focusing on Chapter 9, Equation (9.29)
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in solid-state physics, quantum mechanics, and materials science, will benefit from this discussion.

mhsd91
Messages
22
Reaction score
4
Considering the Nearly Free Electron model of solids, where we assume the valence electrons of some one dimensional(!) solid to move in a weak, periodic (with respect to the solids lattice constant) potensial.

We may derive (which I assume you are familiare with, and will not do here) the central equation as an algebraic reformulation of the time independent Schrödinger eq. corresponding to the model/potential at hand,

<br /> (\lambda_k - \epsilon)C_k + \Sigma_G U_G C_{k-G} = 0<br />



where \lambda_k = (\hbar^2 k^2) / (2m_e), G is the set of possible reciprocal lattice vectors and C_k is det Fourier coefficients corresponding to the solution of the Schrödinger eq.:

<br /> \psi_k = \Sigma_k C_k e^{ikx}<br />.


My problem is that I do not understand what exactly we do find if we solve the central equation.

Say for instance I solve it and find the energy \epsilon_\pm = \lambda_k \pm U_0 for some k. Then I am told the energy gap, \epsilon_{gap} = \epsilon_+ - \epsilon_-, between two energy bands for this k at hand. Please (dis)confirm!?

... and then WHICH two bands are this gap between? (If that makes sense). And is it possible to find values for C_k, how? .. Assuming we know the periodicity of the potential and k.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mhsd91 said:
Considering the Nearly Free Electron model of solids, where we assume the valence electrons of some one dimensional(!) solid to move in a weak, periodic (with respect to the solids lattice constant) potensial.

We may derive (which I assume you are familiare with, and will not do here) the central equation as an algebraic reformulation of the time independent Schrödinger eq. corresponding to the model/potential at hand,

<br /> (\lambda_k - \epsilon)C_k + \Sigma_G U_G C_{k-G} = 0<br />



where \lambda_k = (\hbar^2 k^2) / (2m_e), G is the set of possible reciprocal lattice vectors and C_k is det Fourier coefficients corresponding to the solution of the Schrödinger eq.:

<br /> \psi_k = \Sigma_k C_k e^{ikx}<br />.


My problem is that I do not understand what exactly we do find if we solve the central equation.

Say for instance I solve it and find the energy \epsilon_\pm = \lambda_k \pm U_0 for some k. Then I am told the energy gap, \epsilon_{gap} = \epsilon_+ - \epsilon_-, between two energy bands for this k at hand. Please (dis)confirm!?

... and then WHICH two bands are this gap between? (If that makes sense). And is it possible to find values for C_k, how? .. Assuming we know the periodicity of the potential and k.

yes we can;
in this case C is equal to: +_sgn(U)C
u can find the exact equation in,Solid State Physics By Ashcroft&Mermin.chapter9,equation (9.29)-
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K