Also, a couple of comments are in order regarding your initial post.
1) It doesn't make sense to ask whether a function is measurable with respect to a sigma algebra. What you should be asking is how to show that the function [tex]f[/tex] is measurable with respect to the measure space (which according to your post I can only assume is)
[tex](\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{M} ,m) ,[/tex]
that is, the real line together with the sigma algebra of all lebesgue measurable sets, and the lebesgue measure. Doing this is simply a matter of definition which I have given in the previous post.
2) It doesn't make sense to call a sigma algebra complete (unless this means something specific which I am unaware of). I can only assume the word complete here is referring to the fact that the space which I had previously mentioned is a complete measure space, that is for any subset [tex]E \in \mathcal{M}[/tex] and [tex]A \subseteq E[/tex] we have [tex]m(E)=0 \Rightarrow A \in \mathcal{M}.[/tex]
Thus your post should have read:
How does one show a positive function is measurable with respect to the measure space [tex](\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{M} ,m)[/tex]