Measure for momentum in curved space

Judithku
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When I write down a quantum field (for instance to compute T^00 or some expectation value)

I write it as an integral over momentum space.

If I am working in curved space
should this be divided by sqrt [g]?

(and why or why not?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is - no. The "momentum" space can be thought of just as a Fourier transform, which has nothing to do with a metric structure of spacetime.

Moreover, expansion of the field in terms of plane waves is not a natural thing to do in curved spacetime, because plane waves are not solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation in curved spacetime.
 
Thanks -
I realize in general plane waves are inappropriate but I thought in dealing with a very weak potential that they could be used.

In papers written about the density of states in curved space, they say
\int d^3 x \int d^3 p
is invariant.
I thought this meant that the \sqrt g in the space integral cancels out
with its inverse in the momentum integral.
Do you think that is incorrect?
See for instance
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960189905628
and on the arxiv
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5421
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top