Measuring Impact Force: Simple Methods for a 7th Grade Science Project

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the impact force of toy cars during a crash for a 7th grade science project. The initial suggestion to use the F=ma equation is critiqued, as it overlooks the importance of momentum and impulse in understanding impact. It is clarified that the force of impact is more related to how quickly the cars decelerate upon collision rather than their speed before impact. Alternative methods, such as assuming an elastic collision and using conservation of momentum, are suggested as simpler approaches for the project. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of accurately measuring impact forces and the need for a practical approach suitable for a middle school project.
joanneneil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My 7th grade son has selected a science project which requires to find the impact of two toy cars crashing as part of the larger project. To keep it simple, he will keep one car fixed (i.e. not moving) and the other car crashing into the fixed car at varying speed. I have suggested to use F=ma equation to calculate the force of impact - where mass can be found by weighing the toy car and the acceleration or speed can be found by measuring the distance covered and time it takes to cover the distance by a stop watch assuming the speed is constant. Am I in the right track suggesting this? Is there any other way (simpler) to measure or calculate the impact?


Thanks and Regards
Joanne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

joanneneil said:
… I have suggested to use F=ma equation to calculate the force of impact - where mass can be found by weighing the toy car and the acceleration or speed can be found by measuring the distance covered and time it takes to cover the distance by a stop watch assuming the speed is constant. Am I in the right track suggesting this? Is there any other way (simpler) to measure or calculate the impact?

Hello Joanne! Welcome to PF! :smile:

F = ma is really F = d(mv)/dt, where mv is the momentum.

In that form, you can see that it's really the momentum that matters, and in a crash, we use impulse rather than force, where impulse is force times (a very short) time …

impulse = ∆(mv), ie impulse = change in momentum. :smile:

(you don't really need to know the actual force or acceleration, unless you're examining the crumpling of the cars, or the g-forces on the occupants, neither of which, I suspect, are possible with toy cars! :wink:)​
 
joanneneil said:
Hello, My 7th grade son has selected a science project which requires to find the impact of two toy cars crashing
What exactly is he supposed find out about the impact? Computing the peak force is far from simple in this case.

joanneneil said:
the acceleration or speed can be found by measuring the distance covered and time it takes to cover the distance by a stop watch assuming the speed is constant.
If you assume the speed is constant, the acceleration and force are both zero. Not a very realistic assumption about the impact.

joanneneil said:
Is there any other way (simpler) to measure or calculate the impact?
"The impact" is not a physical quantity you can measure or calculate. The peak force during the impact is proportional to the peak acceleration, but measuring the peak acceleration during impact is more difficult than measuring the peak force itself.
 
Before we go any further with this, you appear to be making a critical and common error OP.

The way the first post reads is that:

You think that the force of an impact depends on how much it accelerated before impact. The force involved depends on how fast it slows down.

So if you had two real cars, both the same and both accelerating. One hits a brick wall, the other hits a large soft rubber wall. The one that hits the brick wall has to get rid of its momentum really quickly, (it goes from whatever speed to 0 very quickly) the forces are high. The soft rubber wall allows the car to decelerate slower, meaning lower forces. This is explained by impulse and momentum, outlined by tiny tim.

If that's not what you meant then please disregard the above.Other than that you are on the right track, trying to measure impact time can be tricky though as they are so short.

Another method is to assume an elastic collison and use conservation of momentum, and conservation of kinetic energy. This will not be strictly true but stops the problems of trying to measure the coefficient of restitution of a toy car. Which is undoubtedly WAAAAAY beyond what you would be wanting for a year 7 project.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top