Measure the state of the second qubit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the probability of measuring the second qubit in a specific quantum state and determining the resulting state of the other two qubits after the measurement. The context is within quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on qubit states and measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expansion of the tensor product and the implications for the measurement of the second qubit. There are attempts to calculate the probability of the second qubit being zero and to express the state of the other qubits post-measurement. Questions arise regarding the normalization of the wavefunction and the notation used to describe the states of the qubits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the notation and the normalization of the wavefunction. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations of the state representation, and a participant expresses appreciation for the guidance received. The discussion appears to be progressing with a focus on refining understanding rather than reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the representation of qubit states and the normalization process, which may affect the probability calculations. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the state of the other qubits after measurement, indicating a need for further exploration of the topic.

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For the state
##(4|00\rangle+3i|11\rangle)\otimes (|0\rangle+i|1\rangle) + (2|01\rangle -i|10\rangle)\otimes(|0\rangle-|1\rangle)##
What's the probability of zero being the outcome of measuring the second bit and what is the state of the other two qubits after measurement?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Expanding the tensor product, for half the states the second qubit is zero so the probability is half, but I don't know what I can say about the state of the other two. Because in states where the second qubit is zero, the other qubits are sometimes one and sometimes zero I think? Unless I've calculated the states wrong? I had the final state after measurement as this:

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{34}} (4|000\rangle + 4i|001\rangle -i|100\rangle +i|101\rangle)##
Which tells me about all three qubits after measurement not just two of them.
Thanks for any help, I really appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
Expanding the tensor product, for half the states the second qubit is zero so the probability is half
The part in bold is not correct.

Kara386 said:
##\frac{1}{\sqrt{34}} (4|000\rangle + 4i|001\rangle -i|100\rangle +i|101\rangle)##
Which tells me about all three qubits after measurement not just two of them.
That's just a question of notation. You can factor out the state of qubit 2, and write the remaining kets for qubits 1 and 3. (To avoid confusion, I would write something like ##| 00 \rangle_{1,3}## for state ##| 000 \rangle##, etc.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kara386
DrClaude said:
The part in bold is not correct.That's just a question of notation. You can factor out the state of qubit 2, and write the remaining kets for qubits 1 and 3. (To avoid confusion, I would write something like ##| 00 \rangle_{1,3}## for state ##| 000 \rangle##, etc.)
Ah, if I actually normalise the wavefunction and use the coefficients then I get a probability of 17/30. And I'll adopt that notation for my answer, thank you, I really appreciate your help!
 
Kara386 said:
Ah, if I actually normalise the wavefunction and use the coefficients then I get a probability of 17/30.
That's better!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K