Measure the state of the second qubit

Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For the state
##(4|00\rangle+3i|11\rangle)\otimes (|0\rangle+i|1\rangle) + (2|01\rangle -i|10\rangle)\otimes(|0\rangle-|1\rangle)##
What's the probability of zero being the outcome of measuring the second bit and what is the state of the other two qubits after measurement?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Expanding the tensor product, for half the states the second qubit is zero so the probability is half, but I don't know what I can say about the state of the other two. Because in states where the second qubit is zero, the other qubits are sometimes one and sometimes zero I think? Unless I've calculated the states wrong? I had the final state after measurement as this:

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{34}} (4|000\rangle + 4i|001\rangle -i|100\rangle +i|101\rangle)##
Which tells me about all three qubits after measurement not just two of them.
Thanks for any help, I really appreciate it!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kara386 said:
Expanding the tensor product, for half the states the second qubit is zero so the probability is half
The part in bold is not correct.

Kara386 said:
##\frac{1}{\sqrt{34}} (4|000\rangle + 4i|001\rangle -i|100\rangle +i|101\rangle)##
Which tells me about all three qubits after measurement not just two of them.
That's just a question of notation. You can factor out the state of qubit 2, and write the remaining kets for qubits 1 and 3. (To avoid confusion, I would write something like ##| 00 \rangle_{1,3}## for state ##| 000 \rangle##, etc.)
 
  • Like
Likes Kara386
DrClaude said:
The part in bold is not correct.That's just a question of notation. You can factor out the state of qubit 2, and write the remaining kets for qubits 1 and 3. (To avoid confusion, I would write something like ##| 00 \rangle_{1,3}## for state ##| 000 \rangle##, etc.)
Ah, if I actually normalise the wavefunction and use the coefficients then I get a probability of 17/30. And I'll adopt that notation for my answer, thank you, I really appreciate your help!
 
Kara386 said:
Ah, if I actually normalise the wavefunction and use the coefficients then I get a probability of 17/30.
That's better!
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top