Measuring Astronomical Distances

  • Thread starter Thread starter jay
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A parsec is defined as the distance at which one arcsecond subtends an angle of one arcsecond between the Earth and the Sun, equating to about 3.26 light years. Parallax measurements can extend to nearly a hundred parsecs with precise instruments capable of sub-arcsecond resolution. For greater distances, Cepheid variables serve as standard candles, allowing astronomers to calculate distances based on their luminosity and apparent magnitude. Additionally, the redshift of light from distant galaxies provides another method for measuring astronomical distances, indicating how fast they are moving away. These various techniques form a "cosmic distance ladder," enabling cross-verification and calibration of measurements across different scales.
jay
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hai..
One 'parsec' is the distance from a star which makes an angle of 1''(1/60 of a degree)with the sun and earth(1.5*10^8 km).So by measuring an angle of 1'' we can measure to a maximum of 2 parsec.
But this only about 7 light years and we are speaking of much much bigger astronomical distances.How these are measured.
Thanks...

Jay
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A second of arc is actually one 1/60 of 1/60 of a degree -- 1/3600 of a degree.

Parallax can actually make measurements all the way out to nearly a hundred parsecs. You just need equipment that is capable of measuring angles in a sub-arcsecond range. An instrument that can only measure an arcsecond resolution would not be very useful, since only one two stars are that close.

Beyond parallax, we can use stars like Cepheid variables to measure distance. Cepheids have a particular relationship between the period of their variation and their total luminosity (how much total energy per unit time the star is producing). If you can measure the period, you can calculate the luminosity. If you know the luminosity (how bright the star is up-close) and the apparent magnitude (how bright the stars is from where we are), you can calculate its distance.

Even beyond that, we can use the redshift of light from distant galaxies to measure their distances. The farther away a galaxy is, the faster it is moving away from us, and the more its light is redshifted.
 
V good explanation:smile:
 
The different methods for measuring distances (e.g., parallax for "close" stars, standard candles for more distant galaxies, etc.) have overlapping ranges where they can be applied. So each method can be used to calibrate/check the other. I forget the name of this procedure...the "cosmic distance ladder" or something like that.

The closer the object, the better the measurement. The more distant, the more uncertainty.

another good description...
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mstardistance.html
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top