Measuring curvature with parallel transport

oldman
Messages
632
Reaction score
5
Parallel transport, as one means of quantifying the curvature of a coordinate space, enables
changes in a vector's components, when it is carried around variously oriented loops in that space, to be properly measured, i.e. by comparisons made at the same location. Those changes which are independent of the size of the loop are measurable manifestations of local curvature, and can be coded into components of the Riemann tensor. Have I got this right?

Now spacetime has four dimensions, three of space and one of time. Transporting anything
around a loop takes time, so a one-way leg along the time dimension must in principle be part of any loop. It is therefore never quite possible --- especially in cosmology! --- to compare the original vector with its parallel-transported version at the same location in spacetime, as is possible with a loop on the 2-D Earth's surface (sometimes used to explain how parallel transport measures curvature).

How could the curvature of spacetime on say, a cosmological scale then be measured, even in thought experiments? And is the separation of spacetime curvature into that of space sections and of time thus moot?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oldman said:
How could the curvature of spacetime on say, a cosmological scale then be measured, even in thought experiments?

At any event in spacetime, spacetime curvature can be measured by looking at tidal forces. Take a collection of test particles that is slightly extended in space and measure how the shaped of the collection deforms over a small time interval.
And is the separation of spacetime curvature into that of space sections and of time thus moot?

Why?
 
George Jones said:
At any event in spacetime, spacetime curvature can be measured by looking at tidal forces. Take a collection of test particles that is slightly extended in space and measure how the shaped of the collection deforms over a small time interval.

Yes. I agree. As with John Baez's clusters of coffee grounds. But I have cosmological puzzles in mind. For example, if one waited long enough, would the test particles move apart because 'the universe is expanding'? Or would they move together as Peacock described recently? I was hoping to avoid this kind of puzzle by thinking of curvature measured by parallel transport instead. But then I have difficulty with parallel transport, too, as I explained.

As to
why?
I just can't see how this method would work, even in principle, in spacetime and allow one to find components of the Riemann tensor and then talk of space foliations, etc.

But perhaps I'm just getting too muddled.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top