Measuring Distance: How Far Are Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iGen3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring
AI Thread Summary
Distance measurement in astronomy relies primarily on parallax for nearby stars, providing a baseline for other methods. Stars exhibit brightness patterns based on their size and age, allowing astronomers to estimate distances using standard candles like Cepheid variables and Type Ia supernovae. These methods are crucial for determining distances across vast scales, with Doppler shift aiding in measurements over longer distances based on Hubble's theory of expansion. The interplay of brightness and distance helps standardize measurements despite variations in star luminosity. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping how astronomers quantify the vast distances to stars.
iGen3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This may be a dumb question, but I by no means have any background in Astronomy, I'm pretty much regulated to Science Channel, History Channel, etc. I wish I could dive into all the fields on these forums but unfortunately I was not blessed with the gifts of understanding mathematics or physics beyond a basic level.

My question is how do you measure the distance of stars when it's light reaches us? I understand we can see that some planets are closer to us with depth perception, but what happens when we lose track of that depth perception?

I guess I'm just wondering how we know if something is 5 million light years from us vs. 7 million light years?

If I were to flash a light beam at you in pitch black from 10 feet vs. 100 feet, that light I assume would be smaller and dimmer from 100 feet, so you could assume that it was farther. But if I used a brigher flashlight at 100 ft and a much weaker, dimmer flashlight at 10 feet wouldn't it appear to be the same? If all stars vary in brightness (which I assumed is true) how do we standardize distance?

Thanks for the input.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is a very good question. Distance measures are very important in astronomy and cosmology at a whole range of scales. To get you started have a look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_ladder" article.

The most fundamental distance measure is Parallax, which can be used on stars relatively close to us in our own galaxy only. This is the first distance measure to understand and pretty much everything else is calibrated in the end from parallax.

Anything that you don't understand or need more info about just ask away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
iGen3 said:
If I were to flash a light beam at you in pitch black from 10 feet vs. 100 feet, that light I assume would be smaller and dimmer from 100 feet, so you could assume that it was farther. But if I used a brigher flashlight at 100 ft and a much weaker, dimmer flashlight at 10 feet wouldn't it appear to be the same? If all stars vary in brightness (which I assumed is true) how do we standardize distance?
Good thought. It turns out that stars all follow brightness patterns based on their size and age, which can be determined by their color. This provides a rough ruler for the measurement you suggest. Some very specific types of stars, such as certain types of variable stars and certain types of supernovas have very specific brightness, which makes them very accurate rulers for that type of measurement.

Over much longer distances, doppler shift is used, under the assumption that the Hubble's theory on expansion is valid (recession speed varies with distance).
 
Cepheids and SN Ia's are powerful [backed by solid physics] independent confirmations of the Hubble flow. They are not model dependent [cosmologically] as LCDM opponents sometimes suggest. In fact, they are the foundation for the LCDM model.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top