I Measuring entangled state of degenerate eigenstates

maxverywell
Messages
197
Reaction score
2
Let's suppose that we have an entangled state of two systems ##A## and ##B##:
$$
\frac{1}{2}\left(|\psi_1 \phi_1\rangle+|\psi_2 \phi_2\rangle \right)
$$
where ##|\psi \rangle## and ##|\phi \rangle## are energy eigenstates of ##A## and ##B## respectively. However the eigenstates##|\phi_1\rangle## and ##|\phi_2\rangle## are degenerate:
$$
\hat{H}_B|\phi_1\rangle=E|\phi_1\rangle
$$
$$
\hat{H}_B|\phi_2\rangle=E|\phi_2\rangle
$$
What will be the state of the system ##AB## after measuring the energy of ##B## and finding the value ##E##?
My guess is:
$$
\frac{\left(|\psi_1\rangle+|\psi_2 \rangle \right)}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{\left(|\phi_1\rangle+\phi_2\rangle \right)}{\sqrt{2}}
$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Has the measurement revealed anything about the state that you didn't already know?
 
If the state is
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big)
And
\hat{H}_{B}|\phi_{1}\rangle= E|\phi_{1}\rangle and \hat{H}_{B}|\phi_{2}\rangle =E|\phi_{2}\rangle
then measuring the energy of B without touching A has the effect of applying the operator \big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big) onto the state, giving us
\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big).
As a result, the state us unaltered, up to a constant factor:
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +\big(I\otimes\hat{H}_{B}\big)|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big)
=E\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Big(|\psi_{1}\rangle|\phi_{1}\rangle +|\psi_{2}\rangle|\phi_{2}\rangle\Big).
 
  • Like
Likes Mentz114
I think that measuring energy and acting on the state with the Hamiltonian operator is not the same thing. For example, if the state is a superposition of energy eigenstates, then this state is also an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, and acting with the Hamiltonian operator on this state doesn't change it. However, measuring the energy will change the state ("collapse it") to one of the eigenstates that compose the initial superposition state.

In my example It seems wrong that measuring the energy of the system B won't have any effect on its state or the state of the whole system AB. Think that if the states ##\phi_1## and ##\phi_2## weren't degenerate (i.e. ##E_1 \neq E_2##), then after the measurement the state of the system B would be ##\phi_1## or ##\phi_2##, therefore the state of the AB becomes ##\psi_1 \phi_1## or ##\psi_2\phi_2##, depending on the outcome of the measurement (##E_1## or ##E_2##). In the degenerate case, the measurement of the energy cannot distinguish this two states in principle, thus creating a superposition of them.
 
Now that I have rethought it, I think that https://www.physicsforums.com/members/jfizzix.190322/ is right, but cannot delete my last post.
 
  • Like
Likes Jilang
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
500
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
412
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top