Measuring high velocity airflow

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around measuring high-velocity airflow generated by a fan with specific parameters, including its efficiency and dimensions. Participants explore various methods for measuring airflow velocity, particularly in contexts where conventional anemometers may not suffice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the air velocity from a fan's specifications and claims it to be around 9.5 m/s based on efficiency and power consumption.
  • Another participant suggests using a Pitot-static tube as a DIY solution for measuring airflow velocity.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the expected airflow velocity, with one reporting a measurement of 32 m/s and questioning the initial calculation.
  • Several participants discuss the availability of commercial anemometers that can measure higher velocities, with some citing specific products that claim to measure up to 68 m/s or more.
  • One participant mentions using hot-wire anemometers for measuring very high velocities, up to 900 m/s, and discusses the need for different equations to account for compressibility at such speeds.
  • Another participant proposes measuring the force of air against a flat surface as an alternative method to estimate airflow velocity.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of online wind force calculators, with participants questioning the reliability of specific tools.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the expected airflow velocities and the effectiveness of various measurement methods. There is no consensus on the best approach or the accuracy of the calculations and tools discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on specific assumptions about efficiency and fluid dynamics, and there are unresolved questions regarding the accuracy of measurement tools and methods suggested.

T C
Messages
384
Reaction score
10
I have a fan that consumes 60 W and blade diameter is 12 inch. If it's just 60% efficient, then the velocity of air coming out of it is around 9.5 m/s. I also have a nozzle inlet of which fits the fan and the diameter at the throat cum exit is 3.5 inch. I want to know how to measure the velocity of the flow coming out of the nozzle as market available anemometers can't measure velocity more than 40 m/s.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can bend some tubing and make yourself a pito-static tube.

However, I did almost exactly this experiment as a kid. Have you actually tried a commercial anemometer yet? I think you will find you achieve a much lower velocity than you expect.

[edit]
Btw, I'm getting 32 m/s. How did you calculate 9.5 m/s?
 
Last edited:
Are you sure? 60 seconds of search found this on Amazon for $40. It says 0-40 m/s range.

1618489158012.png
 
anorlunda said:
Are you sure? 60 seconds of search found this on Amazon for $40. It says 0-40 m/s range.

View attachment 281565
He's asking for higher than 40m/s.
 
OK, here's one that claims 100 mph (44.7 m/s)
1618495090390.png


This one claims 50 m/s
1618495145026.png


Here's one using a hot wire, claims up to 68 m/s
1618496394967.png


Searches for airspeed sensors in aviation sources should easily find more products with ranges higher than 40 m/s.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
anorlunda said:
Searches for airspeed sensors in aviation sources should easily find more products with ranges higher than 40 m/s.
The alternative to an anemometer I suggested above is a DIY pito-static tube, but for a commercial version of it, you can buy a pito-static tube and digital manometer. I have these:
https://www.grainger.com/product/3T...B7B3hGjN16pzGI4HwXwaAvwuEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
https://www.grainger.com/product/EX...YRgWJgI5r4n6ghsHozMaAsDYEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

The one I have will give me a range of up to 75 m/s, but you can buy a manometer with a wider pressure range and measure up to perhaps a 100 before compressibility starts to be a factor.
 
russ_watters said:
Btw, I'm getting 32 m/s. How did you calculate 9.5 m/s?
How? 12 inch diameter means 6 inch radius and that means 15.24 cm i.e. 0.1524 m. Therefore area is 3.14 X (0.1524)^2. 65% of 60 W is 39 W. Now, it's (39/(0.5 X 1.2474 X 3.14 X (0.1524)^2)^(1/3). Calculate it yourself.
 
T C said:
How? 12 inch diameter means 6 inch radius and that means 15.24 cm i.e. 0.1524 m. Therefore area is 3.14 X (0.1524)^2. 65% of 60 W is 39 W. Now, it's (39/(0.5 X 1.2474 X 3.14 X (0.1524)^2)^(1/3). Calculate it yourself.
Don't be so aggressive, I'm trying to help. Of course I calculated it myself. But yep, you're right, I did a conversion wrong. 9.5 m/s is correct.
 
anorlunda said:
Here's one using a hot wire, claims up to 68 m/s
View attachment 281575

Searches for airspeed sensors in aviation sources should easily find more products with ranges higher than 40 m/s.

I've used hot-wire anemometers to measure air flows upwards of 900 m/s before. Mind you, it was technically a COTS system but not one that is particularly cheap.

russ_watters said:
The alternative to an anemometer I suggested above is a DIY pito-static tube, but for a commercial version of it, you can buy a pito-static tube and digital manometer. I have these:
https://www.grainger.com/product/3T...B7B3hGjN16pzGI4HwXwaAvwuEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
https://www.grainger.com/product/EX...YRgWJgI5r4n6ghsHozMaAsDYEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

The one I have will give me a range of up to 75 m/s, but you can buy a manometer with a wider pressure range and measure up to perhaps a 100 before compressibility starts to be a factor.

I have used Pitot tubes to measure velocity of upwards of 900 m/s before. It simply requires a different set of equations that account for compressibility. For example, see the Rayleigh Pitot tube formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #10
Measure the force of the air hitting a flat surface and use an online wind force calculator.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wind-load-d_1775.html

That one is in metric so if you use a square of cardboard 3 inches on a side the area is 0.0058 Sq. meters. plugging that in, a 40m/s wind would yield a force of 5.57n, or 1.252lbs, or 20oz.

There are probably other websites that use English units and can convert the other direction, but I had to leave SOME of the work to you! :wink:

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. Please let us know the measurement/calculated results you get.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
  • #11
Tom.G said:
Measure the force of the air hitting a flat surface and use an online wind force calculator.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wind-load-d_1775.html

That one is in metric so if you use a square of cardboard 3 inches on a side the area is 0.0058 Sq. meters. plugging that in, a 40m/s wind would yield a force of 5.57n, or 1.252lbs, or 20oz.

There are probably other websites that use English units and can convert the other direction, but I had to leave SOME of the work to you! :wink:

Cheers,
Tom

p.s. Please let us know the measurement/calculated results you get.

That calculator isn't even correct. Who makes these things?
 
  • #12
boneh3ad said:
That calculator isn't even correct. Who makes these things?
:cry:

Ouch! Do you know of one that is accurate?

As for who makes them, a WhoIs lookup shows: "Registrant Name: Registration Private"
 
  • #13
Tom.G said:
:cry:

Ouch! Do you know of one that is accurate?

As for who makes them, a WhoIs lookup shows: "Registrant Name: Registration Private"

I mean, technically it works under a very specific set of circumstances I suppose.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K