B Measuring Length: Accurately Calculate Coastline Length

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter _PJ_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Measure
AI Thread Summary
Accurately measuring the length of a coastline involves defining what constitutes the coastline and the scale of measurement, which can vary significantly. The concept of self-similarity and fractal geometry plays a crucial role in understanding the complexities of coastline measurements. Different definitions and scales can lead to vastly different results, making the choice of scale a critical factor. Ultimately, the measurement's validity is contingent upon the chosen parameters, highlighting the inherent challenges in quantifying such natural features. Establishing a clear definition of 'coastline' is essential for any meaningful measurement.
_PJ_
Messages
229
Reaction score
15
How would you approach a most accurate measurement of the "length" of a coastline?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From this kind of wondering comes the idea of self-similarity that inspired folks like Julia and Mandelbrot. A bit of googling might help...

What is your definition of the length of a coastline ? At which tide ?
 
I'm not sure "googling" would be of benefit in establishing the PF readership opinions on how they might approach the problem.

Fractal geometries are intrinsically a part of the problem, and largely exemplify the biggest of such problems. This is pretty much given that lengths of coastlines and attempted or purported measurements thereof are often used to describe fractals.

I thank you for your contribution that it appears you are making that establishing the definition of 'coastline' is one of the primary steps in your approach.
 
The length will always depend on your definition. Typically a fixed length scale is chosen, and the coast is smoothed out to this scale. While that leads to a number, that number depends on the scale chosen, so it is not really meaningful.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
901
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top