Measuring Length with Oscillating Rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter satyudhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Measure
satyudhi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I take a rod and attach to its ends a another rod parallely at a distance r. The second rod oscillates about the first one through 180 degrees with some time period 't'. Now I am in a frame in which this system is moving at a speed 'v' with respect to me. I keep some sand in the way of this system. So when the rod passes over this sand, there will be 2 imprints left, one is the straight line which is the trajectory of our fixed rod while the other is the imprint of the osscilating rod when it struck the sand. This imprint will be of the same lengh as the oscillating rod as the whole (osscillating) rod struck the sand at once. But the oscillating rod is of the same length as the length of the fixed rod, as it it tied at the ends. So in principle the length of the imprint must be equal to the proper length of rod(system). But then this metod of length measurement gives me proper length in all frames, rather than a contracted length. So what will eb the length of the imprint actually?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your reference frame the rod does not have proper length. Anyways, you need to be precise by what you mean "struck the sand at once". In special relativity you will need two clocks (in your reference frame)at different positions measuring the end points at the same time.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
5K
Back
Top