AlMetis said:
Can you please explain why?
The only thing that the principle of relativity states is that the laws of physics are the same in any reference frame.
AlMetis said:
reciprocal kinematics follow from the principle of relativity of motion between inertial frames. If observations of kinematics between inertial frames are not reciprocal, those that fail reciprocity are distinguishing one frame from another, thus (uniform) motion is no longer a relative measure as the principle claims.
What you call reciprocal kinematics does not follow from the principle of relativity. I have already explained why, but I will do so again in more depth.
The laws of physics are expressed as differential equations, or (even better) as a Lagrangian or Hamiltonian. When you solve a differential equation, by itself, you do not get a single solution. Instead, you get a family of solutions. In order to get a single solution you must also supply what is called boundary conditions or initial conditions. Additionally, if the differential equation itself has some parameters, you will need to specify those parameters too.
For example, for a projectile the law of physics is:
##m \ddot z = -mg## or (even better) ##\mathcal L = \frac{1}{2}m \dot z^2 - mgz##.
If you solve this (in either form) you get the equation of motion:
##z(t)=\frac{1}{2} g t^2 + v_0 t + z_0## where ##v_0## and ##z_0## are the initial conditions.
Those initial conditions do not come from the law of physics, and any initial conditions satisfy the equation of motion and therefore the law of physics.
What you are calling the "kinematics" is the equation of motion, not the law of physics. So it depends not only on the law of physics but also the boundary conditions. The principle of relativity requires that the law of physics be the same in both frames, but does not require that the boundary conditions be the same. In you example, the boundary conditions are different in the different frames, so the different kinematics is completely compatible with the principle of relativity.
Only a difference in the laws would be a violation of the principle, which as you stated earlier you were deliberately not doing. Since you used the same laws of physics in both frames in your scenario there is simply no logical way that you could possibly obtain a violation of the principle of relativity.