Measuring the entropy of the universe?

AI Thread Summary
The entropy of the universe may be linked to the number of observable photons, particularly those in the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which dominate the particle count. Photons are produced during energetic processes that increase entropy, but the CMB represents a thermalized radiation field where the entropy per photon remains constant. Consequently, since the photon number in the CMB is stable, the overall entropy of the universe is largely unchanging over time. Small variations in entropy arise from processes like starlight and supernovae, but these contribute minimally to the total. The discussion suggests that while the CMB's entropy is significant, it may not play a crucial role in understanding entropy changes in the universe.
noahcharris
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was recently watching one of Susskind's 'Theoretical Minimum' lectures in which he says that the entropy of the universe may be measured via the number of observable photons, and that somehow these quantities (photon number and total entropy) are somehow linked. Could anybody with knowledge in the area elucidate this connection? Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A link is helpful when asking for feedback on specific material.
 
Photons are a waste product of energetic processes. All such processes increase the entropy of the system within which they occur.
 
Last edited:
I suspect the issue is that the vast number of particles in the universe, by perhaps a factor of a billion, are photons in the CMB. So if you want to track where the entropy is, look there. However, this is not a very good way to look at changes in entropy in the universe, because the CMB is a thermalized radiation field, and the entropy per photon in any thermalized radiation field is the same (it's an order unity constant times the Boltzmann factor). Thus, if you know the photon number, you know the entropy, independent of temperature. Since the photon number in the CMB is not changing, the entropy of the universe as a whole is largely not changing. Where the small changes are coming from on top of that has to do with heat transport, like starlight and supernovae, but it must be a small fraction of the total. So the entropy in the CMB is both the dominant entropy in the universe, and is unchanging with time, so it doesn't sound like it is very important. Maybe it comes up in a multiverse kind of setting, where you could imagine comparing the entropies of different universes.
 
  • Like
Likes noahcharris
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top