Mechanical Engineer from Norway Seeks Help with Problem

Emilsen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a mechanical engineer from Norway who has an work related query.
Please see the attached picture describing the problem.

I'm trying to figure out how heigh mass 1 travels if mass 2 is quick released when being suspended in a spring. I'm also trying to figure out a the maximum acceleration, but that's 2. priority.

I have tried to work out an answer my self, but I don't think it's correct.
The thing I can't get my head around is how to calculate the height mass 1 travels above it's equilibrium due to the speed and spring tension. If the mass 2 had been release slowly, the answer could easily be found using the energy forumula(E=1/2*k*x^2), as far as I can understand.

Any bright minds who could spare a few minutes explaining me this?

Help is much appreciated!

Have a nice sunday.
 

Attachments

  • Problem_Fjær.jpg
    Problem_Fjær.jpg
    16.9 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Emilsen! Welcome to PF! :smile:

I think "quick release" simply means that M2 starts going down, and M1 starts going up.

So you can use conservation of energy (for M1 and the spring).
 
Hi tiny-tim,
Thanks for your reply.

I have tried the following equation setup:
E1spring=E2spring+E2kinetic
1/2kx12=1/2kx22+1/2mv2

I used F=kx to find x1 and x2 for mass 1+2 and mass 1.

I then tried the following formula to calculate how heigh the mass 1 went above the E2spring equilibrium:
v2=v1-gs/v1=0, to find s.

Is this the right path?
 
Hi Emilsen! :smile:
Emilsen said:
I'm trying to figure out how heigh mass 1 travels if mass 2 is quick released when being suspended in a spring.
Emilsen said:
I have tried the following equation setup:
E1spring=E2spring+E2kinetic
1/2kx12=1/2kx22+1/2mv2

nooo …

v is irrelevant, since the system both starts and finishes with v = 0

and what about gravity? :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top