The discussion centers on the differences between engineering technology and traditional engineering degrees, particularly regarding job prospects and accreditation. Engineering technology programs, while often ABET-accredited, do not equate to full engineering degrees, which can impact employability and the ability to become a licensed engineer. Graduates of engineering technology are typically viewed as technologists, entering roles in practical applications rather than conceptual design or research. The conversation also touches on the potential benefits of adding minors or extra courses, though it is noted that this may not significantly enhance job prospects. Concerns about transferring from a less expensive institution to a more prestigious one, like CU Boulder, are discussed, with insights on the challenges and workload differences between the two schools. Ultimately, pursuing a traditional engineering degree is recommended for broader career opportunities, despite the initial cost and difficulty.