Mechanical Failure of a Truncated Cone

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the failure point of a truncated cone under uniaxial stress, essential data includes the material properties, dimensions, and loading conditions. The cone, likely made of ABS reinforced with glass fibers, will experience plastic deformation before failure occurs. A squat cone design will lead to a progressive squashing until it can no longer support the load. Buckling must also be considered due to the eccentric loading and the thin-walled nature of the structure. Understanding the relevant formulas and material properties is crucial for accurate failure analysis.
DougieB39
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What data do you need to calculate the failure point of a truncated cone when it is under uniaxial stress acting downward on the cone? The cone will be under stresses of roughly 30 tonnes and probably constructed of plastic.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well let's see,

You need the material or its properties, the dimensions of the cone including whether it is solid or hollow, a knowledge of the loading conditions at the top to determine any eccentric loading.

Finally you need to establish you failure criterion.

Remember that with the conditions described, unless the cone is slender enough to buckle, the top slice will fail plastically before the slice underneath it and so on. So a squat cone will squash down plastically until either it is flat or it can support the load stress at a particular cross section.
 
The material will probably be ABS reinforced with galss fibres, the cone will be hollow and the load at the top will just be a static load evenly distributed.

Failure conditions will be after it reaches the point that it won't elastically return to its shape.

I'm more interested it what formulae you would need to use and what material properties will need to be found/calculated.

thanks again
 
Since gravity is vertical and the sides of your cone are not, you have a thin walled shell loaded eccentrically, rather than axially. You will definitely have to consider buckling. The dimensions become rather critical.
 
Last edited:
1000m dia. base, 850mm dia. top, 3500mm height, 50mm wall thickness

Thanks
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top