Mechanics of Materials: Statically Indeterminate Problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the methods for solving statically indeterminate problems in mechanics of materials, specifically the method of superposition and the force method. A participant shared their approach using equilibrium equations and compatibility relations but encountered an error due to a signage mistake in their calculations. The consensus is that while different methods can be employed, careful attention to detail is crucial, as all methods ultimately yield the same results when applied correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statically indeterminate structures
  • Familiarity with the method of superposition
  • Knowledge of equilibrium equations in mechanics
  • Basic concepts of material deformation, including δ = (F*L)/(A*E)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of superposition in detail for statically indeterminate problems
  • Learn about the force method and its applications in structural analysis
  • Practice drawing free body diagrams to identify forces and moments accurately
  • Explore compatibility relations and their role in solving deformation problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil and mechanical engineering, particularly those dealing with structural analysis and material mechanics.

jdawg
Messages
366
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD

δAB = δEF

And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • 370_P4.43.png
    370_P4.43.png
    14 KB · Views: 844
Physics news on Phys.org
jdawg said:

Homework Statement


Hi! So my question isn't really about a specific problem, but more of when to use which method.
I'm having trouble knowing when to use the method of super position, the force method, or just being able to go straight into just writing the equilibrium equation and the compatibility relation.

Homework Equations


δ = (F*L)/(A*E)

The Attempt at a Solution


For example, in the problem I attached I originally just summed the forces in the x direction and then wrote out my compatibility relation:

FEF - 2FAB = 80 kN (Because of symmetry let FAB = FCD
ok
δAB = δEF
ok
And then I just solved for my forces using these two equations. But this was incorrect, I don't understand why this doesn't work (The solution I looked at used the method of super position). The total deformation between the two rigid walls should be zero, right? Shouldn't the compression in rods AB and CD equal the expansion in rod EF?
yes
Thanks for any help!
you have a signage error on your first equation. The left sections are in compression and the right section is in tension. Draw free body diagrams and correct your signage.
 
  • Like
Likes CivilSigma and jdawg
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
 
jdawg said:
Thanks so much! I can't believe I made that mistake. So just to clarify, you can pretty much use whichever method as long as you are careful?
Yes, use the method that is easier for you , they all lead to the same result.
 
  • Like
Likes jdawg

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K