I Mechanics of Rolling and Striking Cones

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter EngineeringFuture
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Rolling
AI Thread Summary
An object does not need to be spherical or cylindrical to roll in a straight line, but conical objects face challenges due to their varying circumference. While a cone can roll if forces are applied correctly, it cannot maintain straight rolling without slipping once the force is removed, especially if the apex remains in contact with the surface. The friction between the cone and the surface complicates its ability to roll freely, as different parts of the cone will travel different distances due to their varying radii. This principle is evident in practical applications like tapered roller bearings and vehicle differentials, where wheels of different circumferences rotate at different rates. Overall, the mechanics of rolling cones highlight the complexities of motion in non-uniform shapes.
EngineeringFuture
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Mechanics of rolling cones
Does an object have to be either spherical or cylindrical to be rolled in a straight line. Could an approximately conical object be rolled in a straight line or struck to roll in a straight line? A cone can be rolled in a straight line if different forces are applied at different spots, but once the force is no longer applied, can a cone keep rolling by its inertia alone?

I believe the answer is no, not if the apex of the cone remains on the surface, but I think there are unusual surfaces where a cone of non-uniform density where a cone would slightly deform so the apex would lift into the air and the cone would keep rolling.

Also, my terminology is terrible, so please excuse my terminology. There is one concept that I'm thinking about but can't express.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the circumference of the roller varies, like a cone or frustum, and remains in frictional contact with the flat surface, then the friction will prevent free rolling motion in a straight line, on a flat surface.
 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
Baluncore said:
If the circumference of the roller varies, like a cone or frustum, and remains in frictional contact with the flat surface, then the friction will prevent free rolling motion in a straight line, on a flat surface.
Do you have any links I could see with the diagrams and math worked out?
 
EngineeringFuture said:
Do you have any links I could see with the diagrams and math worked out?
This is more fundamental than mathematics.

Make a conical roller from a sheet of paper and some sticky tape, like a witches hat. Roll it in a straight line and watch how it slips.

If wheels of different circumference, rotate at the same rate, they will travel different distances along arcs of different radii.

When you drive a car around a corner, the wheels on either side rotate at different rates. That is why there is a differential gear.

Conical rollers are used in tapered roller bearings, where the path lengths are in proportion to the roller circumference.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and EngineeringFuture
EngineeringFuture said:
Could an approximately conical object be rolled in a straight line...
Sure, even uphill.

 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
EngineeringFuture said:
TL;DR Summary: Mechanics of rolling cones

A cone can be rolled in a straight line if different forces are applied at different spots,
If the cone is a solid material and the contact with the floor doesn't slip then that is not true.

Why? If the cone rotates once then the distance travelled (on a plane surface) by the part with least radius (r1) will be 2πr1 (the circumference) and the distance travelled by a part near the maximum radius (r2) will travel 2πr2. That implies the fat end travels further than the thin end. That isn't in a straight line. To force a straight line you have to let every part slip.
 
  • Like
Likes EngineeringFuture
sophiecentaur said:
If the cone is a solid material and the contact with the floor doesn't slip then that is not true.

Why? If the cone rotates once then the distance travelled (on a plane surface) by the part with least radius (r1) will be 2πr1 (the circumference) and the distance travelled by a part near the maximum radius (r2) will travel 2πr2. That implies the fat end travels further than the thin end. That isn't in a straight line. To force a straight line you have to let every part slip.
You're absolutely correct. I was an idiot above.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Baluncore

Similar threads

Back
Top