How Fast Does the Elevator Reach Its Top Speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lastone1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the top speed of an elevator in a 198-meter building that takes 40 seconds to ascend, with 6 seconds each for acceleration and deceleration. The initial calculations suggest an acceleration of approximately 0.9705 m/s², leading to a top speed of about 5.82 m/s. However, a correction reveals that the acceleration should actually be around 0.99 m/s², confirming the same top speed. The equation 34v = 198 is derived from analyzing the velocity-time graph, which simplifies the problem. Ultimately, the calculations align, indicating that the top speed is indeed approximately 5.82 m/s.
Lastone1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A building have 198 meters, an elevator take 40 seconds to go all the way up, knowing that the elevator takes 6 secods to speed up and another 6 seconds to speed down and the aceleration is constant during this period. Determine the top speed of the elevator.


Homework Equations



(1) R = Ro + Vot +at²/2
(2) V² = Vo² + 2aΔt


The Attempt at a Solution



I tryed to R1 + R2 + R3 = 198

Now using (1) in R1 in this approach Ro is always zero, and in R1 Vo is also zero
R1 = 18a

For R2 we have aceleration zero but we have initial speed (the final speed of R1) so we have
R2 = 28V1

and R3 = R1 since same aceleration only in oposite direction.
R3 = 18a

for R2 I elaborated V1 using (2)

V1² = Vo² + 2aR1
V1² = 0 + 36a²
V1 = 6a

use that on the R2 formula:

R2 = 28xV1
R2 = 168a

Now going to the final formula:

I tryed to R1 + R2 + R3 = 198

18a + 168a + 18a = 198
a = 0.9705

now using the a on the first 6 secs of the aceleration.

V = at
V = 0.9705*6
V = 5,823529 m/s

The list is telling me the correct answer should be 6... where did I go wrong? The list answer may be wrong? Do you guys have another approach for this exercise? I would like to see it.

Thank you...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You work looks fine, [strike]but your calculated value for a is off. I got a=0.99 m/s2[/strike]. Keep in mind sig figs as well.

EDIT: Never mind. I can't add.
 
Last edited:
I got the same answer too.

34v=198
v=5.82352
 
azizlwl said:
I got the same answer too.

34v=198
v=5.82352

How you got to 34v = 198??
 
It can be easily shown if you sketch the velocity vs time graph.

vt=s
vx6x1/2 +vx6x1/2 + 28xv= 198
34v=198
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top