Mechanism for Gammaray Bursts (computer sim shows neutron star merger works)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanism behind short Gamma-Ray Bursts (SGRBs), specifically highlighting the findings from the research by Luciano Rezzolla and colleagues. Their simulations demonstrate that merging magnetized neutron stars produce a rapidly spinning black hole and a highly magnetized torus, which can launch relativistic jets. This study, published in ApJL, reveals that the magnetic field amplification during the merger aligns with observed SGRB characteristics, establishing a connection between neutron star mergers and SGRB central engines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and Einstein's equations
  • Familiarity with magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
  • Knowledge of neutron star physics and binary systems
  • Experience with numerical simulations in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced magnetohydrodynamics in astrophysical contexts
  • Investigate the properties of neutron stars and their mergers
  • Learn about gravitational wave detection and analysis techniques
  • Study the effective-one-body (EOB) model for gravitational waveforms
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers focused on high-energy astrophysics, gravitational wave studies, and the physics of neutron stars will benefit from this discussion.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.4298
The missing link: Merging neutron stars naturally produce jet-like structures and can power short Gamma-Ray Bursts
Luciano Rezzolla, Bruno Giacomazzo, Luca Baiotti, Jonathan Granot, Chryssa Kouveliotou, Miguel A. Aloy
(Submitted on 22 Jan 2011)
"Short Gamma-Ray Bursts (SGRBs) are among the most luminous explosions in the universe, releasing in less than one second the energy emitted by our Galaxy over one year. Despite decades of observations, the nature of their "central-engine" remains unknown. Considering a binary of magnetized neutron stars and solving Einstein equations, we show that their merger results in a rapidly spinning black hole surrounded by a hot and highly magnetized torus. Lasting over 35 ms and much longer than previous simulations, our study reveals that magnetohydrodynamical instabilities amplify an initially turbulent magnetic field of ~ 1012 G to produce an ordered poloidal field of ~ 1015 G along the black-hole spin-axis, within a half-opening angle of ~ 30 deg, which may naturally launch a relativistic jet. The broad consistency of our ab-initio calculations with SGRB observations shows that the merger of magnetized neutron stars can provide the basic physical conditions for the central-engine of SGRBs."

Published version in ApJL; for high-resolution images and animations see this webpage:
http://numrel.aei.mpg.de/images/relativistic-binary-neutron-star-inspirals

see also this Science Daily article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/04/110407132618.htm

Also this followup article by some of the same AEI authors:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.3874
Accurate numerical simulations of inspiralling binary neutron stars and their comparison with effective-one-body analytical models
Luca Baiotti, Thibault Damour, Bruno Giacomazzo, Alessandro Nagar, Luciano Rezzolla
25 pages, 16 figs
(Submitted on 20 Mar 2011)
"Binary neutron-star systems represent one of the most promising sources of gravitational waves. In order to be able to extract important information, notably about the equation of state of matter at nuclear density, it is necessary to have in hands an accurate analytical model of the expected waveforms. Following our recent work, we here analyze more in detail two general-relativistic simulations spanning about 20 gravitational-wave cycles of the inspiral of equal-mass binary neutron stars with different compactnesses, and compare them with a tidal extension of the effective-one-body (EOB) analytical model. The latter tidally extended EOB model is analytically complete up to the 1.5 post-Newtonian level, and contains an analytically undetermined parameter representing a higher-order amplification of tidal effects. We find that, by calibrating this single parameter, the EOB model can reproduce, within the numerical error, the two numerical waveforms essentially up to the merger. By contrast, analytical models (either EOB, or Taylor-T4) that do not incorporate such a higher-order amplification of tidal effects, build a dephasing with respect to the numerical waveforms of several radians."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Huh, that's pretty cool. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K