Medical Physics, Astrophysics or something else?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the job prospects for someone with a background in physics and a desire to study medical physics or astronomy in Ontario. The individual expresses concern about the limited job opportunities in medical physics, particularly for MSc graduates, and contemplates shifting to astronomy or other healthcare majors. It is noted that medical physics offers better job prospects compared to astronomy, which is primarily an academic field requiring a PhD for competitive positions. Alternative career paths in healthcare are suggested, including radiation therapy, MRI technology, and nuclear medicine, which can be pursued within two years and offer solid job opportunities. The financial implications of pursuing further education versus entering the workforce sooner are also highlighted, emphasizing the benefits of starting a career and contributing to retirement savings.
Debran
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello
I've got my bachelor's degree in physics, Astrophysics from a university in Iran and I came here about 2 months ago. My plan was to study MSc of medical physics in Canada. I like this field so much because it's more practical and specially because I can help people who have cancer, since I used to work with children who had cancer. But I understood that job opportunities for a MSc of Medical physics is not really good here in Ontario which is very disappointing for me.

So now I'm thinking about studying astronomy or another major in healthcare. Even getting a college diploma would be good for me if I could work with it. In fact I have 2 years to study and then I have to go to work. OK, I could sum up my concerns in 2 questions:
1. Does Astronomy have a future in Ontario?
2. What are other programs in healthcare with a good future job opportunities?

Any input would be really appreciated.
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Debran,

If your major concern is job opportunities then it's probably worth noting that the job opportunities in medical physics are generally a lot more than those in astronomy. In medical physics today the most competative candidates for residency positions are CAMPEP-accredited PhD graduates, but there are efforts (particularly in the US) underway to change this so as to avoid "over-educating" candidates for many positions that simply won't require the PhD. MSc medical physics graduates have oportunities outside of just clinical positions too. They can get into industrial positions doing research and product development, technical sales, commissioning and technical support.

Astronomy on the other hand is an academic rather than a professional sub-field. If you seriously want to work as an astronomer then a PhD is pretty much necessary and the few positions available are highly competative even for the PhDs.

If you're looking for something in the medical physics related area that you could get into within two years you might want to consider:
- radiation therapy and medical dosimetry
- MRI technology
- x-ray technology
- nuclear medicine technology
- health physics and radiation protection

It's easy to dismiss "technologist" positions when you have a degree, but from a financial perspective they're actually not that bad assuming that you would start working right away when you graduate. The opportunity cost of remaining in school for a PhD is significant. Some hidden factors are that it delays opportunities to contribute to retirement savings and it delays the opportunity to take out and start paying down a mortgage, for example. Plus, from what I've observed, those who have a physics background in these fields tend to get promoted quickly.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
390
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top