Megasuns containing helium and hydrogen that were huge

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryDaniels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium Hydrogen
AI Thread Summary
Megasuns, massive stars composed mainly of helium and hydrogen, are theorized to be linked to the formation of supermassive black holes. These stars could collapse rapidly under their own gravity, as the fusion force is insufficient to sustain them, leading to the creation of supermassive black holes. Alternatively, some scientists propose that supermassive black holes may simply be ancient black holes that have gained significant mass over time. The discussion highlights the importance of the initial mass of stars in determining their fate. Understanding the role of Megasuns is crucial in the study of black hole formation.
HarryDaniels
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I know that in early time, in the first few billion years, there were stars containing helium and hydrogen that were huge. These were called Megasuns. Can someone tell me if these were the origin of SuperMassive Black holes.

Thank You
Harry
 
Space news on Phys.org


Megasuns are one of our theories attempting to explain supermassive black holes. Some scientists think that very large clouds of gas clumbed into enormous stars which collapsed very quickly under their own gravity (the force produced by fusion not being enough to hold them open) and so formed supermassive black holes. You need a megastar to do this because very large stars blow away much of their mass before they collapse into black holes which prevents them from becoming supermassive black holes.

The other explanation for supermassive black holes is just that they are very old black holes that have accumulated enough mass to be classified as supermassive.

Hope that helped :)
 


Thank you. :)
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top