Mellin Transforms -What could I be doing wrong?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ~Death~
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the computation of the integral of x^(1/4)/(x^2+9)dx from 0 to infinity using Mellin transforms. The user initially applies a formula involving residues but encounters discrepancies with the expected result. Key issues identified include incorrect handling of phase factors and the inappropriate inclusion of sin(5pi/4) in the calculations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately defining polar angle conventions and clearly documenting the contour and residues involved in the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Mellin transforms and their applications in integral computation
  • Complex analysis, specifically residue theory
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and phase factors
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Mellin transforms in detail
  • Learn about residue calculations in complex analysis
  • Explore the implications of phase factors in contour integration
  • Review examples of integrals computed using contour integration methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or complex analysis who seeks to deepen their understanding of Mellin transforms and integral evaluation techniques.

~Death~
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I need to compute integral x^(1/4)/(x^2+9)dx from 0 to infinity

so I use a formula

-pie^(-5pi/4i)/sin(5pi4)SUM residues z^(5/4-1)/(z^2+9) so that's sqrt2pie^(-5pi/4i)3^(1/4)/(6i)(e^(pi/8i)-e^(3pi/8i)) (with the 0<arg<2pi branch of sqrt) but e^(-7pi/4)(e^(pi/8i))-e^(3pi/8i)) which is some horrible number...and that's not the answer according to my book

=(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you made a mistake with the phase factors. It is not wise to put in the sin(5 pi/4) factor in there in the way you did.

You choose a convention for the polar angles and that chaoice then determines both the phase factors of the residues and the two phase factors of the two integrals along the real axis. The sum of the latter two phase factors will be proportional to a sinus term up to some phase factor.
 
Count Iblis said:
Looks like you made a mistake with the phase factors. It is not wise to put in the sin(5 pi/4) factor in there in the way you did.

You choose a convention for the polar angles and that chaoice then determines both the phase factors of the residues and the two phase factors of the two integrals along the real axis. The sum of the latter two phase factors will be proportional to a sinus term up to some phase factor.

i tried what you said

but i sitill can't seem to find where i went wrong

the formula in the text says -pie^(-pia)/sin(pia) SUM residues of fz^(a-1) excluding 0

= Integral -inf to inf z^(a-1)f(z)
 
Just write down the contour, and precisely write down the the residues and the contribution from the two integrals along the real axis, without talking any shortcuts. If you do that, then I can see where you go wrong if you don't get the right answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
6K