Mental math: Division of remainders

  • Thread starter Thread starter sony
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division
sony
Messages
102
Reaction score
0
I'm working on moving away from long time slavery to the calculator

Most forms of division and multiplication is going well now (long division and in some instances lattice multiplication)

One thing I DON'T get though (and can't find any guides for) is dividing remainders.

For example: How do I figure out 22/45? I can see that answer is around 1/2 but HOW can i work it out to exactly 0.488888...?

Some goes for 8/31, 22/39 etc etc...

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sony said:
For example: How do I figure out 22/45? I can see that answer is around 1/2 but HOW can i work it out to exactly 0.488888...?

Some goes for 8/31, 22/39 etc etc...

Hi sony! :smile:

For 22/45, the trick is easy …

make it 44/90. :smile:

For the others, I think you're going to need Vedic mathematics,

unless you're happy with approximate results, in which case …

8/31 = (8/30)(30/31) ~ (8/30)(29/30)

22/39 = (22/40)(40/39) ~ (22/40)(41/40) :wink:
 
I'm not clear on what, exactly, your question is. You say
How do I figure out 22/45? I can see that answer is around 1/2 but HOW can i work it out to exactly 0.488888...?
So are you saying that you can do long division but want to know how you know the "8" will always repeat?

4 divides into 22 5 times but 5*45= 225> 220 so we "try" 4 as a quotient instead. 4*45= 180 which is less than 220: the quotient begins ".4 ". Then 220- 180= 40 so we next have to divide 40 by 45. A "trial divisor" of 8 gives 8*45= 360: that is slightly less than 400 so we now know the quotient starts ".48 ". 400- 360= 40. Now, here is the critical point: That is exactly the same remainder we got before. We don't have "try" any trial divisors- we already know that 45 will go into 400 8 times with remainder 40. If we were to continue on indefinitely, we would never get anything other than a quotient of 8 with a remainder of 40. That tells you that the exact value is 0.48888...
 
tiny-tim, Thank you, I found a guide on Wikipedia that proved very helpful.

HallsofIvy: Then I obviously didn't know long division, I didn't know you could use that to figure out the decimal value of the remainder. Your explanation helped.

Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top