Mercury: Why Doesn't it Vaporize Away?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jobyts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury
AI Thread Summary
Mercury does not vaporize despite its proximity to the sun because it is primarily composed of rock and iron, which require higher temperatures to melt or vaporize. The planet's surface temperature, while high, is not sufficient to reach the melting point of its materials. Similar to Earth, Mercury remains solid because it is not close enough to the sun to achieve the extreme heat necessary for vaporization. Thus, its composition and temperature are key factors in preventing it from vaporizing. Mercury's solid state is maintained due to these geological and thermal characteristics.
jobyts
Messages
226
Reaction score
60
Still being so close to the sun, what prevents the planet Mercury from vaporizing away?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
jobyts said:
Still being so close to the sun, what prevents the planet Mercury from vaporizing away?
Because it is made of rock and iron, mainly iron, and though close it is still not hot enough to melt, let alone vapourise.

Garth
 
To put it another way, Mercury doesn't vaporize for the same reason the Earth doesn't vaporize - it isn't close enough to the sun to get that hot.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top