Schools Merging of Schools: STEM Degree Concerns in North Georgia

  • Thread starter Thread starter kickthatbike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
The recent merger of Southern Polytechnic State University (SPSU) and Kennesaw State University (KSU) has raised concerns among students regarding the implications for STEM degrees. Students worry that a degree from KSU, known primarily as a liberal arts college, may be perceived negatively compared to SPSU's strong STEM focus. While there are fears about potential changes in faculty, curriculum, and job security for staff, there are also opportunities, such as access to accomplished professors and existing research funding at KSU. The discussion highlights that the value of a STEM degree ultimately depends on individual performance, including GPA, research experience, and extracurricular activities. Students are encouraged to consider their career goals and seek guidance on how the merger may affect their graduation timelines and academic paths. Overall, while concerns exist, the degree's value can still be maintained through strategic planning and personal effort.
kickthatbike
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
So we (students) were informed recently of a merging of two schools in north Georgia, SPSU and KSU. SPSU is a science/tech/engineering school, while KSU is... not so much. Everyone is panicking thinking that a STEM degree from what is normally known as a liberal arts college would look bad. Is this a legitimate concern? Or is a STEM degree from most universities just as good, pending good grades, extracurriculars, research, etc. etc. etc.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What changes will there be among your STEM faculty, courses, degree requirements, and research opportunities?
 
I guess there's no good answer to that currently. However, the department chair is quite concerned for his job. The upside would be that there are some quite accomplished physics professors at KSU, as well as some decent science tracks for chem/biochem. And because KSU already has some thesis based graduate programs for these departments, they obviously have some funding/research. It's possible that they could take the physics department and do something similar, which would be excellent. The downside is a possible change of curriculum, some of the current staff losing their jobs, they could possibly decide to do nothing at all with the physics program or drop it, and KSU has a somewhat lower standard of academic performance in the STEM subjects. But if nothing really changes, outside of more funding and the school changing their name, would a STEM degree coming from a liberal arts college really be as bad as everyone's making it out to be?
 
For the most part, a STEM degree from a liberal arts college wouldn't look quite nice. The fact remains that since the schools are merging, the information taught won't differ by much. I wouldn't worry about it too much (unless I had options to go to more reputed universities). You can make up for it by doing research, publications, a good GPA etc. However, if the way they taught the material will change after the merging, then I would consider some other college/university.
 
kickthatbike said:
So we (students) were informed recently of a merging of two schools in north Georgia, SPSU and KSU. SPSU is a science/tech/engineering school, while KSU is... not so much. Everyone is panicking thinking that a STEM degree from what is normally known as a liberal arts college would look bad. Is this a legitimate concern? Or is a STEM degree from most universities just as good, pending good grades, extracurriculars, research, etc. etc. etc.?

Without more information, it's impossible to say how this will affect you. Where are you in terms of graduation, and what is the merger timeline? You are right to be concerned with how a major institutional change will impact your career and there should be some sort of 'student liaison', possibly in the advising office, that can answer questions like: "will I still be able to graduate on time?"

In terms of the 'value' of your degree, ultimately it's your responsibility to create value. This can be done by thinking strategically- what do you want to do next, and how does your undergraduate experience qualify you for that?
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top