Mesh Current Method (complex numbers part)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the mesh current method in electronics, specifically focusing on the conversion of complex numbers into polar form. Participants explore the meaning of the imaginary unit j and how to interpret complex numbers in terms of magnitude and angle.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Andy expresses confusion about the conversion of the complex number 4-j7 into its polar form 8.0623<-60.2551° and seeks clarification on the meaning of j.
  • One participant explains that j represents the imaginary component, likening it to the y-component in a Cartesian coordinate system.
  • Another participant describes the process of converting from rectangular to polar coordinates, detailing how to calculate the magnitude and angle of the complex number.
  • Participants discuss the calculation of the magnitude as the square root of the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary components.
  • There is mention of the need to adjust the angle based on the quadrant in which the complex number lies, particularly when using the arctan function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of conversion from rectangular to polar coordinates, but there is no consensus on the clarity of the explanation or whether further calculations are needed.

Contextual Notes

Some participants may have varying levels of familiarity with complex numbers, which could affect their understanding of the conversion process. The discussion does not resolve all uncertainties regarding the interpretation of angles in different quadrants.

andymarra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Basically, part of my uni course is electronics and some of the mesh current method questions involve complex numbers, mainly the use of j and other things. I would get the answer as the solution gets it down to 4-j7 and then it says this equals 8.0623<-60.2551° ......... ...< is supposed to be like/_ but couldn't find the proper symbol. I just can't understand the meaning of j and such things. How does it get from 4-j7 to this other answer? Just wondering if anyone could explain the conversions of these symbols to normal numbers and degrees as it is saying the final answer is? can provide full solution if needed.
Thanks, Andy


I can do the question, and understand most of it, its a solution from a past paper in university, but I am having trouble understanding only the complex numbers part, mainly the way in which it changes from j over to a number and degrees? i understand only that j is the sqrt of -1. Any help appreciated! Thanks again! Andy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j is the imaginary component. If you've taken mechanical physics, and I assume you have, you can think of anything with a j as being the "y-component" and anything without it being the "x-component"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imaginary_number

Look at that graph. Like I said earlier, the imaginary axis is the y-axis, and the real axis is the x-axis. You can represent any rectangular coordinate as a magnitude and an angle.
 
okay I understand what you're saying, but how does this make 4-j7=8.0623<-60.2551? is there a further calculation that is needed to convert this? Thanks
 
andymarra said:
okay I understand what you're saying, but how does this make 4-j7=8.0623<-60.2551? is there a further calculation that is needed to convert this? Thanks

the magnitude is the squares of the real and the square of the imaginary added and then square rooted:
[tex]\sqrt{4^2 + (-7)^2} = 8.0623[/tex]

the angle is sort of the arctan of the imaginary over the real. Sometimes, you need to modify the angle slightly, because your calculator doesn't know the difference between
arctan[ (-y)/x] and arctan[ y/(-x)]
[tex]arctan(\frac{-7}{4}) = -60.2551^o[/tex]

so the final answer is
[tex]8.0623 \angle -60.2551^o=8.0623e^{-1.0517j}[/tex]
 
andymarra said:
okay I understand what you're saying, but how does this make 4-j7=8.0623<-60.2551? is there a further calculation that is needed to convert this? Thanks

You convert from rectangular to polar coordinates.

The horizontal (real) component is 4, so that is a vector that points to the right along the x axis. The vertical (imaginary) component is -7, so that is a vector that points down. Adding the two vectors gives you the complex result, which is a vector that starts at the origin, and points down to the right. Its length is the hypotenuse of the right triangle (base = 4, height = 7 down), and the angle it forms with the positive x-axis is -60 degrees. The convention for that angle in the rectangular-to-polar conversion is that the angle is positive starting at the x-axis and going in the counter-clockwise direction. So going in the opposite direction makes the angle negative by convention.

Does that make sense?


EDIT -- Ack, beat out again by xcvxcvvc!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K