Mesh Current Method with Dependent Sources

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the mesh current method in circuit analysis, particularly focusing on circuits with dependent sources. Participants are working through the formulation of loop equations and addressing challenges related to dependent current sources.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant sets the mesh current for loop 1 as I1 = 8A and begins writing equations for other loops.
  • Another participant suggests introducing a new variable for the potential change across the dependent current source to aid in writing loop equations.
  • Subsequent posts discuss the formulation of loop equations for loops 3 and 4, with one participant expressing uncertainty about finding the value of Vx.
  • Participants share derived equations and discuss their correctness, with one participant noting discrepancies between their calculated results and simulation results from PSpice.
  • There is a mention of relationships imposed by current sources that could help simplify the equations, but participants express difficulty in applying these relationships.
  • One participant revises their equations and presents them for verification, while another points out potential issues in the first equation derived.
  • Discrepancies in results are highlighted, with one participant finding different values for i2 from their simulation compared to the derived equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the derived equations or the values obtained from simulations. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the formulation and results.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the relationships between mesh currents and dependent sources, and there are unresolved issues with the correctness of the derived equations. The discussion includes attempts to clarify and refine these equations without reaching a definitive resolution.

warden13
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2hp24ue.jpg



Homework Equations



V=I*R

The Attempt at a Solution



I started writing the equations for each loop.

Loop 1 -> I1=8A
Loop 2 -> -6Ix + 4I2 + 2(I2-I3) =0 and Ix=I4-I2
Loop 3 -> I don't know how to approach the dependent current source here.
Loop 4 -> Same here

What I ask is are these equations for loop 1 and 2 is true? If they are not, what's wrong? And how can I write the equations for loop 3 and 4?

Thanks for advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi warden13, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Mesh analysis with current supplies can be a tad tricky at times. If a supply is shared by only one loop then it defines that loop's mesh current and you declare that current "solved". This is what you've done with your loop 1 by setting ##I_1 = 8 A##.

When a current source straddles two loops, as the ##3V_y## source does, you can introduce another loop variable to represent the potential change across that current supply. Use this new unknown in your loop KVL equations. The current value of the supply is then used to write another equation relating the currents of the two loops. In fact, as you write your loop equations you should end up collecting enough of these "auxiliary equations" relating current supplies to mesh currents to be able to reduce the number of unknowns to match the number of loops.

Here's your circuit with loop numbers and mesh currents indicated:

attachment.php?attachmentid=53624&stc=1&d=1354641936.gif


Suppose you call the potential change across the controlled current Vx, assumed to be a potential rise in the direction of the current. Then how might you write your loop 3 equation?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    8.8 KB · Views: 8,817
If I got what you are saying, then loop 3 equations is:

-10 + 2(I3-I2) + Vx = 0

and loop 4 is:

2(I4-I1) - Vx + 4I4 = 0

correct?

But how do i find the Vx?
 
Last edited:
warden13 said:
If I got what you are saying, then loop 3 equations is:

-10 + 2(I3-I2) + Vx = 0

and loop 4 is:

2(I4-I1) - Vx + 4I4 = 0

correct?

But how do i find the Vx?

Yes, that looks good. Now, there are relationships imposed by the current sources which relate the mesh currents. You should be able to replace I4 with a combination of other mesh currents. That'll eliminate I4 from your equation set, leaving I2, I3, and Vx as unknowns, and you should have three equations...
 
I couldn't replace I4, can you tell me how to replace it?
 
warden13 said:
I couldn't replace I4, can you tell me how to replace it?

Well, there's a small chain of relationships involved.

From loop 2 : ##V_y = 4 I_2##

From loop 4: ##3 V_y = I_4 - I_3##

Go from there.
 
So i found the following equations:

Code:
eq1=((-6*(((12*i2)+i3)-i2)) + (4*i2) + (2*(i2-i3)));

eq2=((-10) + 2*(i3-i2) + vx );

eq3=((2*((((12*i2)+i3))-(8))) + (-vx) + (4*(((12*i2)+i3))));

When i solve it with matlab, the results are:

solutions_i2 = 13/5

solutions_i3 = -39/2

solutions_vx = 271/5

But the problem is, i am not so sure about the answers. I simulated the circuit it pspice schematics, but found different results. I wonder if these equations are true.
 
Well, something's gone awry with your equations since your post #3 :smile:

Your results don't match what I found, and they should match a correct simulation, too.

Perhaps you can spell out your workings in more detail.

Edit:
I took a weed-whacker to the forest of parentheses in your expressions and boiled them down to:

1) ##-60i_2 - 8 i_3##
2) ##-10 + 2 i_3 - 2 i_2 + Vx##
3) ##72 i_2 + 6 i_3 - 16 - Vx##

Note that I refer to them as expressions and not as equations; for them to be equations there would have to be an equals sign in there somewhere.

Assuming that each of them should really be set equal to zero, then "equations" 2 and 3 look okay to me, but #1 has a problem with its ##i_2## term.
 
Last edited:
Ok your expressions and mine are same. But that means I still get different results than I am supposed to get.

For instance, when i simulate the circuit, i find the i2 = 5.5A

But in our equations, 13/5=2.6

Code:
You can solve them here:
[url]http://www.numberempire.com/equationsolver.php[/url]
in this format:

((-6*(((12*i2)+i3)-i2))+(4*i2)+(2*(i2-i3))),((-10)+2*(i3-i2)+vx),((2*((((12*i2)+i3))-(8)))+(-vx)+(4*(((12*i2)+i3))))

and variables:

i2,i3,vx

My simulation:
kdlwf7.jpg


The values of R1
21mhvly.jpg


Sorry for big images,long post.
 
  • #10
warden13 said:
Ok your expressions and mine are same. But that means I still get different results than I am supposed to get.

For instance, when i simulate the circuit, i find the i2 = 5.5A

But in our equations, 13/5=2.6

No, not all of our equations are the same. Our first equations (Loop 2) are different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 187 ·
7
Replies
187
Views
59K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K