Mesh/Nodal analysis with superposition, dependent source and diff frequencies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of mesh and nodal analysis in circuits involving superposition, dependent sources, and multiple frequency components. Participants explore the use of phasors and the implications of different circuit configurations on the analysis process.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their approach to solving a circuit problem using phasors and superposition, noting the conversion of a voltage source into phasor notation.
  • Another participant points out a missing equals sign in an equation and emphasizes the need to account for the current supplied by the current source in the analysis.
  • A later reply clarifies the equation and reiterates the importance of including the current source when applying superposition.
  • One participant suggests introducing symbolic variables to simplify the equations and proposes a method to analyze contributions from each source separately.
  • Another participant reflects on the learning process and acknowledges a shift in understanding regarding the treatment of current and voltage sources in circuit analysis.
  • A different participant provides detailed calculations for two sides of the circuit, presenting results for voltages and currents while expressing uncertainty about potential mistakes in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of current sources in the context of superposition and nodal analysis. There is no consensus on the best approach, as some advocate for opening circuits while others suggest incorporating sources directly into the equations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their equations, such as missing terms or assumptions about circuit configurations. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of circuit analysis techniques and their application to specific problems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students preparing for exams in circuit analysis, particularly those grappling with concepts of superposition, phasors, and the treatment of dependent sources in circuits.

careless25
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am preparing for my circuits final and I am having trouble with this question. Can someone guide me through it?

I am trying to solve this using phasors.

I know I will have to use superposition since the circuit contains sources with different frequencies.

So first I start of with converting the Voltage source to a cosine function and then into phasor notation. So I get V = 5∠-90 where ω = 10000 rad/s.

Then 1mH inductor = 10j Ω, 20μF capacitor = -5j Ω and I open circuit the current source.

If I do nodal analysis now, I get 2 equations but don't know how to solve them.

eq1: V1 - V2 = Vx
eq2 at node V2: V2/-5j + (V2-V1)/5 + (V2 - (2Vx+V1))/10j

and of course V1 = 5∠-90.

Now I tried to solve for Vx and I got 0...Which doesn't make sense since that would create a short circuit. Help?!?

Thanks

C25
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-12-08 at 1.52.58 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2012-12-08 at 1.52.58 AM.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 770
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your equation 2 is not an equation; where's the equals sign?

But your main problem with equation 2 is that you haven't dealt with the current supplied by the current source. It injects a current into node 2; where is it in equation 2?
 
Your equation 2 is not an equation; where's the equals sign?

Sorry that equation should be:

V2/-5j + (V2-V1)/5 + (V2 - (2Vx+V1))/10j = 0

But your main problem with equation 2 is that you haven't dealt with the current supplied by the current source. It injects a current into node 2; where is it in equation 2?

As I mentioned in my post, I am doing this using superposition so I open circuited the current source. I am trying to find Vx due to only the Voltage source first.

Eventually I can say Vx(due to voltage soure) + Vx(due to current source) = Vx. (aka superposition)
 
You only need to solve for V2 since V1 is known.

Introduce symbolic variables: let Vac represent the independent voltage source and Iac represent the current source.

Make the substitutions V1=Vac and Vx=(Vac-V2) in your equation 2 and you should be able to get this solution:

attachment.php?attachmentid=53754&stc=1&d=1355007043.png


But if you also add the term for the contribution of the current source Iac to your equation you can get a solution for V2 that amounts to a superposition solution. You can set Vac in this expression to zero and see the contribution of Iac alone. Similarly, you can set Iac to zero and see the contribution of Vac alone.

attachment.php?attachmentid=53755&stc=1&d=1355007043.png
 

Attachments

  • Img1.png
    Img1.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 923
  • Img2.png
    Img2.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 882
I see what you meant by your fisrt comment now.

The textbook I am learning from teaches that we "open circuit" the current sources and ignore them in any of the KCL/KVL equations, solve for the unknows and then do the same with voltage sources.

Now that I have seen your solution it makes a lot more sense to do it the way you do (which is technically the same way.). makes life easier in the end since its just one equation to deal with both the sources.

Thanks for all the help!

C25

P.S. I finished writing my final today morning, would have been nice to know this. But oh well, I was too late in posting it here.
 
careless25,

Sorry I am late is answering.

So first I start of with converting the Voltage source to a cosine function and then into phasor notation. So I get V = 5∠-90 where ω = 10000 rad/s.

Let's call the right current side the "A" side and the left voltage side the "B" side. Then ωA = 5000, ωB = 10000, XLA = 5j, XLB = 10j, XCA = -10j, XCB = -5j, I= 0.5, V = 5j . Notice that the voltage source is 90 degrees ahead of the current source because it is a sin instead of a cos.

Setting up the equations for the "A" side gives vxA = -V2A, and -I+V2A/XCA+V2A/R+(V2A-(2vxA))/XLA=0 .

Solving gives vxA = -0.344828-0.862069 and V2A = 0.344828+0.862069

Setting up the equatons for the "B" side gives VxB = V-V2B, and V2B/XCB+(V2B-V)/R+(V2b-(V+2vxB))/XLB=0

Solving gives VxB = -4-2j and V2B = 4+7j

So V2 = V2A+V2B = 4.34483+7.86207j

The power from just the current side "A" is (|vxA|^2)/R = 0.172414

Hope I didn't make any mistakes. If you have any questions, just ask.

Ratch
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K